Статья: НЕЛИНЕЙНАЯ МОДЕЛЬ ДЕФОРМАЦИИ АДГЕЗИВНЫХ ЯЧЕЕК ПОД ДЕЙСТВИЕМ НАПРЯЖЕНИЯ СДВИГА (2026)

1. McGrail D.J., Mezencev R., Kieu Q.M.N., et al. SNAIL-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition produces concerted biophysical changes from altered cytoskeletal gene expression. FASEB J., 2015, vol. 29, iss. 4, pp. 1280-1289. DOI: 10.1096/fj.14-257345 EDN: UUSXWB
2. Sullivan E., Harris M., Bhatnagar A., et al. Boolean modeling of mechanosensitive epithelial to mesenchymal transition and its reversal. IScience, 2023, vol 26, iss. 4, art. 106321. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106321 EDN: WOFQSH
3. Christiansen J.J., Rajasekaran A.K. Reassessing epithelial to mesenchymal transition as a prerequisite for carcinoma invasion and metastasis. Cancer Res., 2006, vol. 66, iss. 17, pp 8319-8326. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0410
4. Kim D.H., Xing T., Yang Z., et al. Epithelial mesenchymal transition in embryonic development, tissue repair and cancer: a comprehensive overview. J. Clin. Med., 2018 vol. 7, no. 1, art. 1. DOI: 10.3390/jcm7010001 EDN: KPXZLA
5. Thiery J.P., Acloque H., Huang R.Y.J., et al. Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell, 2009, vol. 139, iss. 5, pp. 871-890. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.007 EDN: NBCVHP
6. Yang B.W., Bai J., Shi R., et al. TGFB2 serves as a link between epithelial-mesenchymal transition and tumor mutation burden in gastric cancer. Int. Immunopharmacol., 2020, vol. 84, art. 106532. DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106532
7. Wu Y., Zhou B.P. New insights of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer metastasis. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin., 2008, vol. 40, iss. 7, pp. 643-650. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7270.2008.00443.x
8. Ang H.L., Mohan C.D., Shanmugam M.K., et al. Mechanism of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer and its regulation by natural compounds. Med. Res. Rev., 2023, vol. 43, iss. 4, pp. 1141-1200. DOI: 10.1002/med.21948 EDN: MTJWZL
9. Suresh S. Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells. Acta Biomater., 2007, vol. 3, iss. 4, pp. 413-438. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2007.04.002 EDN: KMIVJL
10. Cross S.E., Jin Y.S., Rao J., et al. Nanomechanical analysis of cells from cancer patients. Nature Nanotech., 2007, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 780-783. DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2007.388
11. Daniel C., Traub F., Sachsenmaier S., et al. An exploratory study of cell stiffness as a mechanical label-free biomarker across multiple musculoskeletal sarcoma cells. BMC Cancer, 2023, vol. 23, art. 862. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11375-3
12. Guo X., Bonin K., Scarpinato K., et al. The effect of neighboring cells on the stiffness of cancerous and non-cancerous human mammary epithelial cells. New J. Phys., 2014, vol. 16, art. 105002. DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/16/10/105002
13. Zhao Y., Ye X., Xiong Z., et al. Cancer metabolism: the role of ROS in DNA damage and induction of apoptosis in cancer cells. Metabolites, 2023 vol. 13, no. 7, art. 796. DOI: 10.3390/metabo13070796 EDN: DCYOPY
14. Alloisio G., Rodriguez DB., Luce M., et al. Cyclic stretch-induced mechanical stress applied at 1 Hz frequency can alter the metastatic potential properties of SAOS-2 osteosarcoma cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2023, vol. 24, no. 9, art. 7686. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24097686 EDN: JVHKQR
15. Walters B., Uynuk-Ool T., Rothdiener M., et al. Engineering the geometrical shape of mesenchymal stromal cells through defined cyclic stretch regimens. Sci. Rep., 2017, vol. 7, art. 6640. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-06794-9
16. Dhein S., Schreiber A., Steinbach S., et al. Mechanical control of cell biology. Effects of cyclic mechanical stretch on cardiomyocyte cellular organization. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol., 2014, vol. 115, iss. 2-3, pp. 93-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2014.06.006 EDN: YFATBZ
17. Onal S., Alkaisi M.M., Nock V. Application of sequential cyclic compression on cancer cells in a flexible microdevice. PLoS One, 2023, vol. 18, art. e0279896. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279896
18. Wong A.K., Llanos P., Boroda N., et al. A parallel-plate flow chamber for mechanical characterization of endothelial cells exposed to laminar shear stress. Cel. Mol. Bioeng., 2016, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 127-138. DOI: 10.1007/s12195-015-0424-5 EDN: WXUQWD
19. Xin Y., Hu B., Li K., et al. Circulating tumor cells with metastasis-initiating competence survive fluid shear stress during hematogenous dissemination through CXCR4-PI3K/AKT signaling. Cancer Lett., 2024, vol. 590, art. 216870. DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.216870
20. Po A., Giuliani A., Masiello M.G., et al. Phenotypic transitions enacted by simulated microgravity do not alter coherence in gene transcription profile. npj Microgravity, 2019, vol. 5, art. 27. DOI: 10.1038/s41526-019-0088-x
21. Melica M.E., Cialdai F., La Regina G., et al. Modeled microgravity unravels the roles of mechanical forces in renal progenitor cell physiology. Stem Cell Res. Ther., 2024, vol. 15, art. 20. DOI: 10.1186/s13287-024-03633-3
22. Janmaleki M., Pachenari M., Seyedpour S.M., et al. Impact of simulated microgravity on cytoskeleton and viscoelastic properties of endothelial cell. Sci. Rep., 2016, vol. 6, art. 32418. DOI: 10.1038/srep32418
23. Espina J.A., Cordeiro M.H., Milivojevic M., et al. Response of cells and tissues to shear stress. J. Cell Sci., 2023, vol. 136, no. 18, art. jcs260985. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.260985 EDN: OUARLJ
24. Qiu Y., Gao T., Smith B.R. Mechanical deformation and death of circulating tumor cells in the bloodstream. Cancer Metastasis Rev., 2024, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1489-1510. DOI: 10.1007/s10555-024-10198-3 EDN: QAXKPH
25. Kerdegari S., Canepa P., Odino D., et al. Insights in cell biomechanics through atomic force microscopy. Materials, 2023, vol. 16, no. 8, art. 2980. DOI: 10.3390/ma16082980 EDN: DFHVJA
26. Zhou G., Zhang B., Tang G., et al. Cells nanomechanics by atomic force micrscopy: focus on interactions at nanoscale. Adv. Phys. X, 2021, vol. 6, iss. 1, art. 1866668. DOI: 10.1080/23746149.2020.1866668 EDN: YADTFL
27. Niu M., Luo G., Shu X., et al. Portable quantitative phase microscope for material metrology and biological imaging. Photonics Res., 2020, vol. 8, iss. 7, art. 1253. DOI: 10.1364/prj.396135 EDN: MIUIHS
28. Butt S.S., Fida I., Fatima M., et al. Quantitative phase imaging for characterization of single cell growth dynamics. Lasers Med. Sci., 2023, vol. 38, art. 241. DOI: 10.1007/s10103-023-03902-2
29. Pirone D., Bianco V., Miccio L., et al. Beyond fluorescence: advances in computational label-free full specificity in 3D quantitative phase microscopy. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 2024, vol. 85, art. 103054. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2023.103054
30. Branecka N., Lekszycki T. Experimental methods of living cells mechanical loading: review. Contin. Mech. Thermodyn., 2023, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1165-1183. DOI: 10.1007/s00161-022-01099-3 EDN: UGHUCB
31. Moreno-Flores S., Benitez R., Vivanco M.D.M., et al. Stress relaxation and creep on living cells with the atomic force microscope: a means to calculate elastic moduli and viscosities of cell components. Nanotechnology, 2010, vol. 21, no. 44, art. 445101. DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/21/44/445101 EDN: OMLKQV
32. Babahosseini H., Carmichael B., Strobl J.S., et al. Sub-cellular force microscopy in single normal and cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 2015, vol. 463, iss. 4, pp. 587-592. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.05.100 EDN: USGMML
33. Efremov Y.M., Okajima T., Raman A. Measuring viscoelasticity of soft biological samples using atomic force microscopy. Soft Matter., 2020, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 64-81. DOI: 10.1039/c9sm01020c EDN: LFPCPQ
34. Safa B.T., Huang C., Kabla A., et al. Active viscoelastic models for cell and tissue mechanics. R. Soc. Open Sci., 2024, vol. 11, no. 4, art. 231074. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.231074 EDN: RCJWYK
35. Chang T.K., Rossikhin Y.A., Shitikova M.V., et al. Application of fractional-derivative standard linear solid model to impact response of human frontal bone. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech., 2011, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 148-153. DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2011.11.003 EDN: PEPPKZ
36. De Sousa J.S., Freire R.S., Sousa F.D., et al. Double power-law viscoelastic relaxation of living cells encodes motility trends. Sci. Rep., 2020, vol. 10, art. 4749. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-61631-w
37. Carmichael B., Babahosseini H., Mahmoodi S.N., et al. The fractional viscoelastic response of human breast tissue cells. Phys. Biol., 2015, vol. 12, no. 4, art. 046001. DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/12/4/046001 EDN: USGMMV
38. Bonfanti A., Kaplan J.L., Charras G., et al. Fractional viscoelastic models for power-law materials. Soft Matter., 2020, vol. 16, no. 26, pp. 6002-6020. DOI: 10.1039/d0sm00354a EDN: ALGWWS
39. Kang S., Yang X., Li Y., et al. A fractional viscoelastic mechanical model for speed optimization of robotic cell microinjection. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron., 2024, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 4514-4525. DOI: 10.1109/TMECH.2024.3378908
40. Fabry B., Maksym G.N., Butler J.P., et al. Scaling the microrheology of living cells. Phys. Rev. Lett., 2001, vol. 87, no. 14, art. 148102. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.148102
41. Sollich P., Lequeux F., Hébraud P., et al. Rheology of soft glassy materials. Phys. Rev. Lett., 1997, vol. 78, no. 10, pp. 2020-2023. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2020
42. Boocock D., Hirashima T., Hannezo E. Interplay between mechanochemical patterning and glassy dynamics in cellular monolayers. PRX Life, 2023, vol. 1, no. 1, art. 013001. DOI: 10.1103/prxlife.1.013001 EDN: OHFRQI
43. Grozdanov S., Lucas A., Poovuttikul N. Holography and hydrodynamics with weakly broken symmetries. Phys. Rev. D, 2019, vol. 99, no. 8, art. 086012. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.99.086012 EDN: WXHYBK
44. Fielding S.M. Elastoviscoplastic rheology and aging in a simplified soft glassy constitutive model. J. Rheol., 2020, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 723-738. DOI: 10.1122/1.5140465 EDN: LCKNOP
45. Deshpande V.S., McMeeking R.M., Evans A.G. A bio-chemo-mechanical model for cell contractility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2006, vol. 103, no. 38, pp. 14015-14020. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0605837103
46. Mcgarry J.P., Fu J., Yang M.T., et al. Simulation of the contractile response of cells on an array of micro-posts. Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 2009, vol. 367, iss. 1902, pp. 3477-3497. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2009.0097
47. Truong D., Bahls C.R., Nebe B., et al. Simulation of actin distribution of osteoblasts on titanium pillar arrays using a bio-chemo-mechanical model. Int. J. Numer. Method Biomed. Eng., 2018, vol. 34, no. 8, art. e3097. DOI: 10.1002/cnm.3097
48. Sun S.-Y., Zhang H., Fang W., et al. Bio-chemo-mechanical coupling models of soft biological materials: a review. In Bordas S.P.A. (ed.): Advances in Applied Mechanics, vol. 55. Elsevier, 2022, pp. 309-392. DOI: 10.1016/bs.aams.2022.05.004
49. Nikitiuk A.S., Koshkina A.A., Bayandin Y.V., et al. On thermodynamics and relaxation properties of eukaryotic cells. Int. J. Non Linear Mech., 2023, vol. 157, art. 104532. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2023.104532 EDN: DJSTJQ
50. Eldridge W.J., Sheinfeld A., Rinehart M.T., et al. Imaging deformation of adherent cells due to shear stress using quantitative phase imaging. Opt. Lett., 2016, vol. 41, iss. 2, art. 352. DOI: 10.1364/ol.41.000352
51. Landau L.D., Lifshitz E.M. Statistical physics. Pergamon Press, 1969.
52. Eldridge W.J., Ceballos S., Shah T., et al. Shear modulus measurement by quantitative phase imaging and correlation with atomic force microscopy. Biophys. J., 2019, vol. 117, iss. 4, pp. 696-705. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.07.008 EDN: KKTIWG
53. Meidav T. Viscoelastic properties of the standard linear solid. Geophys. Prospect., 1964, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 80-99. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1964.tb01891.x
54. Shliomos M.I., Raikher Y.L. Orientational ordering and mechanical properties of solid polymers. Sov. Phys. JETP, 1978, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1760-1783.