1. Глазьев С.Ю. (1993). Теория долгосрочного технико-экономического развития. Москва: Владар. EDN: YSXIUV
2. Глазьев С.Ю. (2017). Семь сценариев для России // Стратегические приоритеты. № 1(13). С. 101-105. EDN: YUBXWT
3. Нельсон Р., Уинтер С. (2000). Эволюционная теория экономических изменений. Москва: Финстатинформ.
4. Перес К. (2011). Технологические революции и финансовый капитал. Динамика пузырей и периодов процветания. Москва: Дело. EDN: QULVFB
5. Сухарев О.С. (2019). Управление структурой технологического развития: риск и “процентный портфель” // Управленец. Т. 10, № 1. С. 2-15. DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2019-10-1-1 EDN: VVOHHN
6. Хейнман С.А. (2008). Эффективность национальной экономики: источники роста, потери и резервы. Москва: ИЭ РАН. Т. 1-2.
7. Ahmad N., Youjin L., Žiković S., Belyaeva Zh. (2023). The effects of technological innovation on sustainable development and environmental degradation: Evidence from China. Technology in Society, vol. 72, 102184. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102184
8. Amann E. (2002). Globalisation, industrial efficiency and technological sovereignty: Evidence from Brazil. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 875-888. DOI: 10.1016/S1062-9769(02)00144-8 EDN: DWVQNR
9. Bassens D., Hendrikse R. (2022). Asserting Europe’s technological sovereignty amid American platform finance: Countering financial sector dependence on Big Tech? Political Geography, vol. 97, 102648. DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102648
10. Chandio A.A., Sethi N., Dash D.P., Usman M. (2022). Towards sustainable food production: What role ICT and technological development can play for cereal production in Asian-7 countries? Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 202, 107368. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2022.107368
11. Chaturvedi T. (2023). How corporate development activities resolve the legitimacy-adaptation dilemma: A case study in technological substitution. Journal of Business Research, vol. 164, 113983. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113983
12. Crafts N. (2005). The First Industrial Revolution: Resolving the Slow Growth/Rapid Industrialization Paradox. Journal of the European Economic Association, vol. 3, no. 2/3, Papers and Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Congress of the European Economic Association (Apr. - May, 2005), pp. 525-534.
13. Dattée B., Weil H.B. (2007). Dynamics of social factors in technological substitutions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 579-607. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2007.03.003
14. Edler J., Blind K., Kroll H., Schubert T. (2023). Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for innovation policy. Defining rationales, ends and means. Research Policy, vol. 52, no. 6, 104765. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2023.104765 EDN: JFINLC
15. Erebak S., Turgut T. (2021). Anxiety about the speed of technological development: Effects on job insecurity, time estimation, and automation level preference. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, vol. 32, no. 2, 100419. DOI: 10.1016/j.hitech.2021.100419 EDN: WKTXLW
16. Eum W., Lee J-D. (2022). The co-evolution of production and technological capabilities during industrial development. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 63, pp. 454-469. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2022.07.001 EDN: EZJKQU
17. Gabardo F.A., Pereima J.B., Einloft P. (2017). The incorporation of structural change into growth theory: A historical appraisal. EconomiA, vol, 18, no. 3, pp. 392-410. DOI: 10.1016/j.econ.2017.05.003
18. Hasan M.M., Du F. (2023). Nexus between green financial development, green technological innovation and environmental regulation in China. Renewable Energy, vol. 204, pp. 218-228. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.12.095 EDN: ZJHWEA
19. Jiang H., Zhao Sh., Zhang S., Xu X. (2018). The adaptive mechanism between technology standardization and technology development: An empirical study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 135, pp. 241-248. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.015 EDN: IEMFCW
20. Kamble S.S., Gunasekaran A., Gawankar S.A. (2018). Sustainable Industry 4.0 framework: A systematic literature review identifying the current trends and future perspectives. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, vol. 117, pp. 408-425. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2018.05.009 EDN: YIGHJJ
21. Långstedt J., Spohr J., Hellström M. (2023). Are our values becoming more fit for artificial intelligence society? A longitudinal study of occupational values and occupational susceptibility to technological substitution. Technology in Society, vol. 72, 102205. DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102205
22. Lu Y. (2017). Industry 4.0: A survey on technologies, applications and open research issues. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, vol. 6, pp. 1-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jii.2017.04.005 EDN: YFDMII
23. Magistretti S., Dell‘Era C., Verganti R. (2020). Searching for the right application: A technology development review and research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 151, 119879. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119879 EDN: XQPLHS
24. Ponte A., Leon G., Alvarez I. (2023). Technological sovereignty of the EU in advanced 5G mobile communications: An empirical approach. Telecommunications Policy, vol. 47, issue 1, 102459. DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102459 EDN: ITPYRG
25. Romano L., Traù F. (2017). The nature of industrial development and the speed of structural change. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, vol. 42, pp. 26-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2017.05.003
26. Sukharev O.S. (2018). Public administration: Institutions, resource transfer, jobs. Upravlenets / The Manager, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 11-25. DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2018-9-5-2 EDN: YOQJJB
27. Sukharev O.S. (2020). Portfolio theory in solving the problem structural choice. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 13, no. 9, 195. DOI: 10.3390/jrfm13090195 EDN: DZTDNA
28. Takashima N. (2023). Self-enforcing international environmental agreements with third-party organizations: Initial payment, technological development, and refunding. Economics Letters, vol. 228, 111164. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4386872
29. Yan Zh., Sun Z., Shi R., Zhao M. (2023). Smart city and green development: Empirical evidence from the perspective of green technological innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 191, 122507. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122507
30. Wang M-Y., Lan W-T. (2007). Combined forecast process: Combining scenario analysis with the technological substitution model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 74, issue 3, pp. 357-378. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2005.08.002
31. Wu L., Chen W. (2023). Technological achievements in regional economic development: An econometrics analysis based on DEA. Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 6, e17023. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4335563 EDN: TDRQJE
32. Tinbergen J. (1967). Development planning. London: World University Library.