1. Гидденс Э. Трансформация интимности. СПб.: Питер, 2004. EDN: QXJYLB
2. Apostolou M. The Nature of Parent-Offspring Confl ict over Mating: From Differences in Genetic Relatedness to Disagreement over Mate Choice // Evolutionary Psychological Science. 2017. № 3. P. 62-71.
3. Bateman A. J. Intra-Sexual Selection in Drosophila // Journal of Heredity. 1948. Vol. 2 (Pt. 3). P. 349-368.
4. Bode A., Kushnick G. Proximate and Ultimate Perspectives on Romantic Love // Frontiers in Psychology. 2021. № 12. Р. 1-29.
5. Brase G. L. Cues of Parental Investment as a Factor in Attractiveness // Evolution and Human Behaviour. 2006. № 27. Р. 145-157.
6. Buss D. M. Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. Austin: University of Texas: Routledge, 2016.
7. Dixson A. F. Sexual Selection and the Origins of Human Mating Systems. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
8. Dunn M. J., Doria M. V. Stimulated Attraction Increases Sex Attractiveness Ratings in Females but not Males // Journal of Social, Evolutionary and Cultural Psychology. 2010. № 4. Р. 1-17.
9. Fritzsche K., Arnqvist G. Homage to Bateman: Sex Roles Predict Sex Differences in Sexual Selection // Evolution. 2013. № 67. Р. 1926-1936.
10. Galperin A., Haselton M. G., Frederick D. A., Poore J., von Hippel W., Buss D. M., Gonzaga G. C. Sexual Regret: Evidence for Evolved Sex Differences // Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2013. № 42 (7). Р. 1145-1161. EDN: YDWGDL
11. Garcia J. R., Reiber C. Hook-up Behavior: A Biopsychosocial Perspective // Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology. 2008. № 2. Р. 192-208.
12. Gladue B. A., Delaney J. J. Gender Differences in Perception of Attractiveness of Men and Women in Bars // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1990. № 16. Р. 378-391. EDN: JPAHZN
13. Hall J. A., Park N., Song H., Cody M. J. Strategic Misrepresentation in Online Dating: The Effects of Gender, Self-monitoring and Personality Traits // Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2010. № 27. Р. 117-135.
14. Jonason P. K., Buss D. M. Avoiding Entangling Commitments: Tactics for Implementing a Short-term Mating Strategy // Personality and Individual Differences. 2012. № 52. Р. 606-610.
15. Kennair L. E. O., Schmitt D. P., Fjeldavli Y. L., Harlem S. K. Sex Differences in Dexual Desires and Attitudes in Norwegian Samples // Interpersona. 2009. № 3 (Supplement 1). Р. 1-32.
16. Kruger D. J., Fisher M., Jobling I. Proper and Dark Heroes as Dads and Cads: Alternative Mating Strategies in British Romantic Literature // Human Nature. 2003. № 14. Р. 305-317. EDN: EHLZUW
17. Mishra S., Clark A., Daily M. One Woman’s Behavior Effects the Attractiveness of Others // Evolution and Human Behavior. 2007. № 28. Р. 145-149.
18. Owen J., Fincham F. D. Effects of Gender and Psychosocial Factors on “Friends with Benefi ts” Relationship Among Young Adults // Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2011. № 40 (2). Р. 311-320. EDN: TPOGZR
19. Sacco D. F., Young S. G., Brown C. M., Bernstein, M. J., Hugenberg, K. Social Exclusion and Female Mating Behavior: Rejected Women Show Strategic Enhancement of Short-term Mating Interest // Evolutionary Psychology. 2012. № 10. Р. 573-587.
20. Schützwohl A., Fuchs A., McKibben W. F., Shackelford T. K. How Willing are You to Accept Sexual Requests from Slightly Unattractive to Exceptionally Attractive Imagined Requestors? // Human Nature. 2009. № 20. Р. 282-293. EDN: YBCQXX
21. Snyder B. F. Gowaty P. A. A Reappraisal of Bateman’s Classic Study of Intrasexual Selection // Evolution. 2007. № 61. Р. 2457-2468.
22. Waynforth D., Delwadia S., Camm M. The Infl uence of Women’s Mating Strategies on Preference for Masculine Facial Architecture // Evolution and Human Behavior. 2005. № 26. Р. 409-416.