Статья: ON THE MANIPULABILITY OF THE CONSTRAINED GALE-SHAPLEY AND BOSTON SCHOOL CHOICE MECHANISMS. PART 2. COMPARING HARM OF MANIPULATIONS (2025)

Читать онлайн

This work presents a simulation-based comparative analysis on the harm of manipulations in two widely used school choice mechanisms — the constrained Boston and Gale– Shapley — through the perspective of the share (percentage) of students getting into schools and the average welfare of students. Thus, this part of the research extends the manipulability analysis presented in the fi rst part but analyzes not the vulnerability of mechanisms to manipulations but the harm of manipulations per se. We also investigate the connections between the parameters of the problems (percentage of sophisticated students and the mechanism constraint, i. e. the maximum number of schools that students are allowed to list in their preferences) and the outcomes of the mechanisms. Finally, we analyze and compare two different mechanism designs: the one where students submit their preferences by the same point in time and the one where students are allowed to change their preferences through a certain common period of time. In this part of the research we show two main advantages of the Gale–Shapley mechanism compared to the Boston mechanism: the higher percentage of students getting into schools and, under the realistic assumption of correlated preferences of students, higher average welfare of sincere students, with the average welfare of all students being statistically equal under two mechanisms in the most of analyzed scenarios

Ключевые фразы: дизайн рынка, теория распределения студентов по школам, манипулируемость
Автор (ы): АУСТЕР И. А. (AUSTER I. A.)
Журнал: ЖУРНАЛ НОВОЙ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОЙ АССОЦИАЦИИ

Предпросмотр статьи

Идентификаторы и классификаторы

SCI
Экономика
УДК
33. Экономика. Народное хозяйство. Экономические науки
Для цитирования:
АУСТЕР И. А. ON THE MANIPULABILITY OF THE CONSTRAINED GALE-SHAPLEY AND BOSTON SCHOOL CHOICE MECHANISMS. PART 2. COMPARING HARM OF MANIPULATIONS // ЖУРНАЛ НОВОЙ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОЙ АССОЦИАЦИИ. 2025. № 4 (69)
Текстовый фрагмент статьи
Будьте первым, кто начнет обсуждение

Если у вас возникли вопросы или появились предложения по содержанию статьи, пожалуйста, направляйте их в рамках данной темы.