1. Ghanizadeh A., Al-Hoorie A.H., Jahedizadeh S. Higher Order Thinking Skills in the Language Classroom: A Concise Guide. Springer Cham; 2021. 195 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-56711-8
2. Šeďová K., Šalamounová Z., Švaříček R., Sedláček M. Getting Dialogic Teaching into Classrooms. Singapore: Springer; 2020. 184 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-9243-0
3. Clinton J. Argument as Dialogue Across Difference: Engaging Youth in Public Literacies. New York, London: Routledge; 2017. 178 p. DOI: 10.4324/9781315619590
4. Schwarz B.B., Baker M.J. Dialogue, Argumentation and Education: History, Theory and Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2017. 294 р. DOI: 10.1017/9781316493960
5. Morrow R.A. Dialogue, critical thinking, and critical pedagogy. In: Peters M.A., ed. Encyclopedia of Teacher Education. Singapore: Springer; 2022:189-235. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-1179-6_320-1
6. Ellerton P., Kelly R. Creativity and critical thinking. In: Berry A., Buntting C., Corrigan D., Gunstone R., Jones A., eds. Education in the 21st Century: STEM, Creativity and Critical Thinking. Springer International Publishing; 2021:9-27. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-85300-6_2
7. Marangio K., Carpendale J., Cooper R., et al. Supporting the development of science pre-service teachers’ creativity and critical thinking in secondary science initial teacher education. Research in Science Education. 2024;54:65-81. DOI: 10.1007/s11165-023-10104-x EDN: HFWXJV
8. Spector J.M., Ma S. Inquiry and critical thinking skills for the next generation: from artificial intelligence back to human intelligence. Smart Learn. 2019;6(8). DOI: 10.1186/s40561-019-0088-z
9. Abrami P.C., Bernard R.M., Borokhovski E., Waddington D.I., Wade C.A., Persson T. Strategies for teaching students to think critically: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research. 2015;85(2):275-314. DOI: 10.3102/0034654314551063
10. Ennis R.H. Critical thinking across the curriculum: a vision. Topoi. 2018;37:165-184. DOI: 10.1007/s11245-016-9401-4 EDN: KMVZNH
11. Gronostay D. To argue or not to argue? The role of personality traits, argumentativeness, episte mological beliefs and assigned positions for students’ participation in controversial political classroom discussions. Unterrichtswissenschaft. 2019;47:117-135. DOI: 10.1007/s42010-018-00033-4
12. Asterhan C.S.C., Schwarz B.B. Argumentation for learning: well-trodden paths and unexplored territories. Educational Psychologist. 2016;51(2):164-187. DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458
13. Rapanta C., Macagno F. Authentic questions as prompts for productive and constructive sequences: A pragmatic approach to classroom dialogue and argumentation. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal. 2023;11(3). DOI: 10.5195/dpj.2023.546 EDN: UFQDPE
14. Martínez C.J.P., Catasús G.M., Fontanillas R.T. Impact of using learning analytics in asynchronous online discussions in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2020;17:39. DOI: 10.1186/s41239-020-00217-y EDN: BWTYDJ
15. Lommi S. Causal and epistemic relevance in appeals to authority. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia Analitica. 2015;6(1). DOI: 10.13130/2037-4445/4673
16. Rapanta C. Argumentation as critically oriented pedagogical dialogue. Informal Logic. 2019;39(1). DOI: 10.22329/il.v39i1.5116
17. Kallio H., Virta K., Kallio M. Modelling the components of metacognitive awareness. International Journal of Educational Psychology. 2018;7(2):94-122. DOI: 10.17583/ijep.2018.2789
18. Zenker F. Introduction: reasoning, argumentation, and critical thinking instruction. Topoi. 2018;37(1):91-92. DOI: 10.1007/s11245-016-9416-x EDN: DRYIXN
19. Snaza N. Aleatory entanglements: (post)humanism, hospitality and attunement - a response to Hugo Letiche. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy. 2018;14:256-272. DOI: 10.1080/15505170.2017.1398700
20. Letiche H. Bewildering pedagogy. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy. 2017;14:236-255. DOI: 10.1080/15505170.2017.1335662
21. Alexander Н.A. What is critical about critical pedagogy? Conflicting conceptions of criticism in the curriculum. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2016;50(10):903-916. DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2016.1228519
22. Alexander P.A. Reflection and reflexivity in practice versus in theory: challenges of conceptualization, complexity, and competence. Educational Psychologist. 2017;25(4):307-314. DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2017.1350181
23. Leś T. The research potential of educational theory: on the specific characteristics of the issues of education. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2017;49(14):1428-1440. DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2017.1313716
24. Koivuniemi M., Järvenoja H., Järvelä S. Teacher education students’ strategic activities in challenging collaborative learning situations. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction. 2018;19:109-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2018.05.002
25. Kim M.-Y., Wilkinson I.A.G. What is dialogic teaching? Constructing, deconstructing, and reconstructing a pedagogy of classroom talk. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction. 2019;21:70-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.02.003
26. Irawan N., Valentina T.F. The language of argumentation: a book review. Journal of Language and Education. 2021;7(2):274-276. DOI: 10.17323/jle.2021.12538 EDN: VIVPOS
27. Boogaart R., Jansen H., van Leeuwen M. The Language of Argumentation. Cham: Springer; 2021. 323 p. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-52907-9
28. Rapanta C., Macagno F. The dimensions of argumentative texts and their assessment. Studia Paedagogica. 2020;24(4):11-44. DOI: 10.5817/SP2019-4-1
29. Nussbaum M.E., Dove I.J., Putney L.G. Bridging dialogic pedagogy and argumentation theory through critical questions. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal. 2023;11(3). DOI: 10.5195/dpj.2023.548 EDN: VRYABP