1. Chen, T., Fu, X.-C., Bao, Z.-M., Xia, J.-J., Wang, R.-J. Experimental study on the extinguishing efficiency of compressed air foam sprinkler system on oil pool fire. Procedia Engineering. 2018. 211. Pp. 94–103. DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.12.142
2. Shafiq, I., Hussain, M., Shafique, S. et al. A comprehensive numerical design of firefighting systems for onshore petroleum installations. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2021. 38. Pp. 1768–1780. DOI: 10.1007/s11814-021-0820-6
3. Till, R.C., Coon, J.W. Foam Systems. Fire Protection. Springer. Cham, 2019. Pp. 147–157. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-90844-1_11
4. Dlugogorski, B.Z., Kennedy, E.M., Schaefer, T.H., Vitali, J. What properties matter in fire-fighting foams? Proceedings of the 2nd National Research Institute of Fire and Disaster Symposium – Science, Technology and Standards for Fire Suppression Systems. Tokyo, 2002. Pp. 57–76.
5. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Fire extinguishing media – Foam concentrates. Part 3: Specification for low-expansion foam concentrates for top application to water-miscible liquids. ISO 7203-3:2019. Geneva, 2019. 39 p.
6. Kamliuk, A.N., Likhomanov, A.O., Grachulin, A.V. Pennye orositeli dlia avtomaticheskikh ustanovok pozharotusheniia [Foam sprinklers for automatic extinguishing systems]. Minsk: UGZ, 2023. 244 p.
7. Korol’chenko, D.A., Sharovarnikov, A.F., Degaev, E.N. Fire extinguishing effectiveness of low multiplicity foam. Science Review. 2015. 8. Pp. 114–120.
8. Hil’, E.I., Voevoda, S.S., Sharovarnikov, A.F., Makarova, I.P. Experimental determination of minimum discharge intensity and optimum rate of foaming agent input during suppression of oil products flame. Fire Safety. 2015. 4. Pp. 76–81.
9. Laundess, A.J., Rayson, M.S., Dlugogorski, B.Z., Kennedy, E.M. Small-Scale Test Protocol for Firefighting Foams DEF(AUST)5706: Effect of Bubble Size Distribution and Expansion Ratio. Fire Technology. 2011. 47. Pp. 149–162. DOI: 10.1007/s10694-009-0136-2
10. Myers, T.M., Marshall, A.W. A description of the initial fire sprinkler spray. Fire Safety Journal. 2016. 84. Pp. 1–7. DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2016.05.004
11. Kamluk, A., Likhomanov, A. Increasing foam expansion rate by means of changing the sprinkler geometry. Fire Safety Journal. 2019. 109. Article no. 102862. DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2019.102862
12. Kim, T. Resolving the initial spray structure of fire sprinklers with a volume-of-fluid modeling. Fire Safety Journal. 2016. 133. Article no. 103641. DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2022.103641
13. Kim, T. Factors affecting water flux distribution of fire sprinklers and effect of water flux uniformity on fire suppression characteristics. Fire Safety Journal. 2023. 138. Article no. 103804. DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2023.103804
14. Kim, T. Optimization of fire sprinkler design for uniform water flux distribution using a micro-genetic algorithm. Fire Safety Journal. 2024. 144. Article no. 104090. DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2024.104090
15. Myers, T., Trouve, A., Marshall, A. Predicting sprinkler spray dispersion in FireFOAM. Fire Safety Journal. 2018. 100. Pp. 93–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2018.07.008
16. Myers, T., Marshall, A., Baum, H.R. A Free-Surface Model of a Jet Impinging On a Sprinkler Head. Fire Safety Science. 2014. 11. Pp. 1184–1195. DOI: 10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.11-1184
17. Link, E.D., Jordan, S.J., Myers, T.M., Sunderland, P.B., Marshall, A.W. Spray dispersion measurements of a sprinkler array. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute. 2017. 36(2). Pp. 3305–3311. DOI: 10.1016/j.proci.2016.06.056
18. Valencia, A., Marshall, A.W. A universal lookup table for determining sprinkler spray patterns. Fire Safety Journal. 2021.126. Article no. 103432. DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2021.103432
19. Ren, N., Wang, Y. Modeling of Sprinkler skipping for the suppression of large-scale rack-storage fires. Fire Safety Journal. 2023. 141. Article no. 103953. DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2023.103953
20. Kamluk, A., Likhomanov, A., Grachulin, A. Field testing and extinguishing efficiency comparison of the optimized for higher expansion rates deflector type sprinkler with other foam and foam-water sprinklers. Fire Safety Journal. 2020. 116. Article no. 103177. DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103177
21. Tafreshi, H.V., Pourdeyhimi, B. The effects of nozzle geometry on waterjet breakup at high Reynolds numbers. Experiments in Fluids. 2003. 35. Pp. 364–371. DOI: 10.1007/s00348-003-0685-y
22. Jie, H., Jingjing, W., Xiumei, L., Beibei, L., Wei, L., Ming, G., Yongwei, X., Zonghang, C., Jichao, M. Investigation on Surface Wave Characteristic of Water Jet. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2019. 2019. Article no. 4047956. DOI: 10.1155/2019/4047956
23. Lin, S.P., Reitz, R.D. Drop and spray formation from a liquid jet. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics. 1998. 30. Pp. 85–105. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.fluid.30.1.85
24. Trettel, B. Reevaluating the jet breakup regime diagram. Atomization and Sprays. 2020. 30(7). Pp. 517–556. DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.2020033171
25. Likhomanov, A.O., Kamlyuk, A.N. The breakup length of axisymmetric turbulent jet in the foam deflector type sprinkler for automatic extinguishing systems. Journal of Civil Protection. 2021. 5(2). Pp. 159–173. DOI: 10.33408/2519-237X.2021.5-2.159
26. Eggers, J., Villermaux, E. Physics of liquid jets. Reports on Progress in Physics. 2008. 71(3). Article no. 036601. DOI: 10.1088/0034-4885/71/3/036601
27. Likhomanov, A.O., Govor, E.G., Kamlyuk, A.N. On the relationship between the sprinkler geometric parameters, stability and expansion rate of the generated foam. Journal of Civil Protection. 2021. 5(2). Pp. 174-185. DOI: 10.33408/2519-237X.2021.5-2.174
28. Likhamanau, A., Kamluk, A. Mathematical model for predicting foam expansion rate depending on the geometrical parameters of deflector type sprinkler. Nauchnye i obrazovatelnye problemy grazhdanskoi zashchity [Scientific and educational problems of civil protection]. 2019. 41(2). Pp. 27–38.
29. Kotousov, L.S. Measurement of the water jet velocity at the outlet of nozzles with different profiles. Technical Physics. 2005. 50. Pp. 1112–1118. DOI: 10.1134/1.2051447
30. Kotousov, L.S. Measurement of the water jet velocity at the outlet of nozzles with different profiles. Technical Physics. 2006. 51. Pp. 289. DOI: 10.1134/S1063784206020265