1. Abramov R. 2016. Understanding professionalism in the Soviet Union and Post-Soviet Russia: an analytical review // The American Sociologist 47(1), 81-101. URL:. DOI: 10.1007/s12108-015-9294-5 EDN: UJRMJG
2. Berryman J. 2019. A comparison of the German and Russian literary intelligentsia in Arnold Hauser’s Social History of Art // Studies in East European Thought 71(2), 141-155. URL:. DOI: 10.1007/s11212-019-09327-4
3. Bryson J. J. 2018. Patiency is not a virtue: the design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics // Ethics and Information Technology 20(1), 15-26. URL:. DOI: 10.1007/s10676-018-9448-6
4. Dmitriev T. 2017. Max Weber and Peter Struve on the Russian Revolution // Studies in East European Thought 69(4), 305-328. URL:. DOI: 10.1007/s11212-017-9294-9 EDN: UEDIIK
5. Epstein A., Kheimets N. 2000. Immigrant intelligentsia and its second generation: Cultural segregation as a road to social integration? // Journal of International Migration and Integration / Revue de l’integration et de La Migration Internationale 1(4), 461-476. URL:. DOI: 10.1007/s12134-000-1025-1
6. Gaines B. R. 1997. Knowledge management in societies of intelligent adaptive agents // Journal of Intelligent Information Systems 9(3), 277-298. URL: https://doi. org/10.1023/A:1008658220563.
7. Glazov Y. 1979. The Soviet intelligentsia, dissidents and the West // Studies in Soviet Thought 19(4), 321-344. URL:. DOI: 10.1007/BF00832020
8. Hirose L. M. 1995. Organisational spaces and intelligent machines: A metaphorical approach to ethics. AI & SOCIETY 9(1), 43-56. URL:. DOI: 10.1007/BF01174478
9. Horujy S. S. 2018. The ethical catastrophe of contemporary Russia and its foresights in Russian thought // Studies in East European Thought 70(4), 221-234. URL:. DOI: 10.1007/s11212-018-9311-7 EDN: WDSVGL
10. Kennedy D. 2014. The hermeneutic of suspicion in contemporary American legal thought // Law and Critique 25(2), 91-139. URL:. DOI: 10.1007/s10978-014-9136-6
11. Kennedy M. D. 1992. The intelligentsia in the constitution of civil societies and post-communist regimes in Hungary and Poland // Theory and Society 21(1), 29-76. URL:. DOI: 10.1007/BF00993462
12. Kijima K. 2001. Why stratification of networks emerges in innovative society: intelligent poly-agent systems approach // Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 7(1), 45-62. URL: https://doi. org/10.1023/A:1011377532016.
13. Loogma K., Ümarik M., Sirk M., Liivik R. 2019. How history matters: The emergence and persistence of structural conflict between academic and vocational education: The case of post-Soviet Estonia // Journal of Educational Change 20(1), 105-135. URL:. DOI: 10.1007/s10833-018-09336-w
14. Malyankar R. M., Findler N. V. 1998. A methodology for modeling coordination in intelligent agent societies // Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 4(4), 317-345. URL: https://doi. org/10.1023/A:1009634413228.
15. Martin D. 2014. Secularization: an international debate from a British perspective. Society. 51(5), 464-471. DOI: 10.1007/s12115-014-9812-z
16. Ostrovsky M. A. 2017. It is time to think “physiologically”. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences 87(1), 93-99. URL:. DOI: 10.1134/S1019331617010105 EDN: YVCYVR
17. Oushakine S. A. 2009. Introduction: wither the intelligentsia: the end of the moral elite in Eastern Europe. Studies in East European Thought 61(4), 243. URL:. DOI: 10.1007/s11212-009-9093-z
18. Shalin D. N. 2017. Extended mind and embodied social psychology: contemporary perspectives. Society 54(3), 279-290. URL:. DOI: 10.1007/s12115-017-0135-8
19. Vinogradova V. A. 2009. Intellectuals and intelligentsia in the pages of library periodicals. Scientific and Technical Information Processing 36(4), 234. URL:. DOI: 10.3103/S0147688209040078
20. Zysiak A. 2019. Hysteresis, academic biography, and political field in the People’s Republic of Poland // Theory and Society 48(3), 483-508. URL:. DOI: 10.1007/s11186-019-09349-1
