1. Большев Л.Н., Смирнов Н.В. Таблицы математической статистики. М.: Наука, 1983.
Bolshev L.N., Smirnov N.V. Tables of Mathematical Statistics. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1983 (in Russian).
2. Кендалл М., Стюарт А. Статистические выводы и связи. Т. 2. М.: Наука, 1973.
Kendall M., Stewart A. The Advanced Theory of Statistics. Vol. 2. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1973 (in Russian).
3. Крамер Г. Математические методы статистики. М.: Мир, 1975.
Cramer H. Mathematical Methods of Statistics. Moscow: Mir Publ., 1975 (in Russian).
4. Лемешко Б.Ю., Лемешко С.Б. Об устойчивости и мощности критериев проверки однородности средних. Измерительная техника. 2008;9:23-28. EDN: MVJZQL
Lemeshko B.Y., Lemeshko S.B. Power and robustness of criteria used to verify the homogeneity of means. Meas Tech. 2008;51(9):950-959. DOI: 10.1007/s11018-008-9157-3
5. Лойко В.И., Луценко Е.В., Орлов А.И. Высокие статистические технологии и системно-когнитивное моделирование в экологии. Краснодар: КубГАУ, 2019. EDN: PJGBXC
Loiko V.I., Lutsenko E.V., Orlov A.I. High Statistical Technologies and System-cognitive Modeling in Ecology. Krasnodar: KubSAU Publ., 2019 (in Russian). EDN: PJGBXC
6. Орлов А.И. О методах проверки однородности двух независимых выборок. Заводская лаборатория. Диагностика материалов. 2020;86(3):67-76. DOI: 10.26896/1028-6861-2020-86-3-67-76 EDN: WUYGII
Orlov A.I. On methods of testing the homogeneity of two independent samples. Zavodskaya Laboratoriya. Diagnostika Materialov = Industrial Laboratory. Diagnostics of Materials. 2020;86(3):67-76. 10.26896/1028-6861-2020-86-3-67-76 (in Russian). DOI: 10.26896/1028-6861-2020-86-3-67-76(inRussian)
7. Фишер Р.А. Статистические методы для исследователей. М.: Госстатиздат, 1958.
Fisher R.A. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Moscow: Gosstatizdat Publ.,1958 (in Russian).
8. Benjamin D.J., Berger J.O., Johannesson M., Nosek B., Wagenmakers E.J., Berk R., Bollen K.A., … Wolpert R., Xie Y., Young C., Zinman J., Johnson V.E. Redefine statistical significance. Nat Hum Behav. 2018;2(1):6-10. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z
9. Boukerche A., Zheng L., Alfandi O. Outlier detection: methods, models, and classification. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR). 2020;53(3):1-37. DOI: 10.1145/3381028
10. Conover W.J. The rank transformation - an easy and intuitive way to connect many nonparametric methods to their parametric counter-parts for seamless teaching introductory statistics courses. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat. 2012;4(5):432-438. DOI: 10.1002/wics.1216
11. Davenport J.M., Webster J.T. The Behrens-Fisher problem, an old solution revisited. Metrika. 1975;22(1):47-54.
12. Efron B. Computers and the theory of statistics: thinking the unthinkable. SIAM Rev. 1979;21(4):460-480. DOI: 10.1137/1021092
13. Fisher R.A. Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples from an indefinitely large population. Biometrika. 1915;10(4):507-521. EDN: ILMXPP
14. Fisher R.A. Applications of “Student’s” distribution. Metron. 1925a;5:90-104.
15. Fisher R.A. Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1925b.
16. Hammer Ø. Harper D.A.T., Ryan P.D. PAST: PAleontological STatistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electronica. 2001;4(1):9.
17. Hazel L.N. The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics. 1943;28(6):476-490.
18. Hesterberg T.C. What teachers should know about the bootstrap: resampling in the undergraduate statistics curriculum. Am Stat. 2015;69(4):371-386. DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2015.1089789
19. Kennedy-Shaffer L. Before p < 0.05 to beyond p < 0.05: using history to contextualize p-values and significance testing. Am Stat. 2019;73(sup1):82-90. DOI: 10.1080/00031305.2018.1537891
20. Lehmann E.L. “Student” and small-sample theory. Stat Sci. 1999;14(4):418-426.
21. Lumley T., Diehr P., Emerson S., Chen L. The importance of the normality assumption in large public health data sets. Annu Rev Public Health. 2002;23(1):151-169. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.23.100901.140546
22. Rochowicz J.A., Jr. Bootstrapping analysis, inferential statistics and EXCEL. Spreadsheets in Education ( SiE). 2010;4(3). http://epublications.bond.edu.au/ejsie/vol4/iss3/4.
23. Rousselet G., Pernet C.R., Wilcox R.R. An introduction to the bootstrap: a versatile method to make inferences by using data-driven simulations. Meta-Psychology. 2023;7:2058. DOI: 10.15626/MP.2019.2058 EDN: SWXLAM
24. Smith H.F. The problem of comparing the results of two experiments with unequal errors. J Council Sci Industrial Res. 1936a;9:211-212.
25. Smith H.F. A discriminant function for plant selection. Annals of Eugenics. 1936b;7(3):240-250.
26. Student. The probable error of a mean. Biometrika. 1908;6:1-25. DOI: 10.2307/2331554
27. Student. Tables for estimating the probability that the mean of a unique sample of observations lies between -∞ and any given distance of the mean of the population from which the sample is drawn. Biometrika. 1917;XV:414-417.
28. Student. Statistics in biological research. Nature. 1929;124:93. DOI: 10.1038/124093b0
29. Student’s t-test (t-критерий Стьюдента) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Student%27s_t-test [обновлено 10 января 2023; процитировано 30 июня 2024. доступно: https://wwwи.рф].
30. Wang H., Bah M.J., Hammad M. Progress in outlier detection techniques: a survey. IEEE Access. 2019;7;107964-108000. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2932769
31. Wasserstein R.L., Schirm A.L., Lazar N.A. Moving to a world beyond “p<0.05”. The American Statistician. 2019;73(sup.1):1-19. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48783683.
32. Welch B.L. The significance of the difference between two means when the population variances are unequal. Biometrika. 1938;29(3/4):350-362. EDN: ILOWTF