Autonyms, a blend of auto- (car) and -nyms (names), constitute a subclass of ergonyms (object names) and a subdomain of onomastics I am prone to term ‘autonomastics’, a subdivision which is still understudied rather unstudied. No past research has investigated autonyms as novel tradenames dealers and purchasers assign to cars in automotive transactions. The onomastic facets of autonyms have received no attention from specialist linguists across or within world languages. This article aims to conduct a seminal lexical-semiotic analysis of ‘autonyms’ (car names). A lexicosemiotic analysis of autonyms in Egyptian Arabic is conducted by analysing their lexical and semiotic aspects with particular focus on onomastic and sign-based classifications. The article undertakes a typological analysis of a convenience sample of a dataset extracted from three e-platforms (Dubizzle, Youm7, and Masrawy) and validated through an interrater reliability questionnaire. The analysis draws mainly on a comprehensive but non-exhaustive state-of-the-art typology of denominata and denominating practices. Results show that car trademarks are transacted on the local Egyptian market under culture-specific tradenames which establish iconic, indexical, and symbolic relations between the representamens and their objects. The tradenames cover a myriad of autonyms denoting animals (zoonyms), insects (entomonyms), reptiles (herpetonyms), fish (ichthyonyms), birds (ornithonyms), and objects (ergonyms). It shows the role of Egyptian Arabic vernacular in communicating collective cognition of naming practices in the Egyptian automotive community. The article recommends replicating the devised typology with crosslinguistic and cross-cultural datasets to inform future research into onomastics in general and autonomastics in particular and probably inspire automobile industries to redesign their cars accordingly.
Идентификаторы и классификаторы
Shakespeare’s question What’s in a name? is an interrogative statement made in Romeo and Juliet to indicate that names of things are synthetic, nonsensical, and irrelevant. Probably, the intended reply to the question he raised might be: Nothing in a name. Conversely, a great deal can be conveyed in a name and in a nomenclature, a Latin word meaning assigning of names, which, at its simplest surface structure and meaning, is a process of assigning a name to make its denotatum or designatum a distinct( ive) entity.
Список литературы
1. Abdikhalikovna, K. F. (2020). Principles of toponyms (place names) classifications. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(6), 73-79. DOI: 10.18415/ijmmu.v7i6.1738 EDN: XONXHA
2. Aceto, M. (2002). Ethnic personal names and multiple identities in Anglophone Caribbean speech communities in Latin America. Language in Society, 31(4), 577-608. DOI: 10.1017/S0047404502314040 EDN: FOIRZF
3. Algeo, J. (2000). Onomastics as an interdisciplinary study. Names: A Journal of Onomastics, 48(3), 265-274. DOI: 10.1179/nam.2000.48.3-4.265
4. Baker, M. (2018). In other words: A coursebook on translation (3rd ed.). Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315619187
5. Bateman, J. A. (2018). Peircean semiotics and multimodality: Towards a new synthesis. Multimodal Communication, 7(1), Article 20170021. DOI: 10.1515/mc-2017-0021
6. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.
7. Cacciafoco, F. P., & Cavallaro, F. (2023). Place names: Approaches and perspectives in toponymy and toponomastics. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781108780384
8. Cameron, D. (2003). Gender and language ideologies. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 447-467). Blackwell.
9. Cohen, R. J., Swerdlik, M. E., & Sturman, E. D. (2018). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
10. Culleton, C. A. (1991). Naming and gender in James Joyce’s fiction. Names: A Journal of Onomastics, 39(4), 303-318. DOI: 10.1179/nam.1991.39.4.303
11. Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley.
12. Felecan, O., & Felecan, D. (2014). Unconventional anthroponyms: Formation patterns and discursive function. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
13. Fornalczyk, A. D. (2011). Translating anthroponyms: Exemplified by selected works of English children’s literature in their Polish versions. Peter Lang.
14. Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 343-373. DOI: 10.1086/209515 EDN: CSGGIT
15. Freeman, M. S. (2002). A new dictionary of eponyms. OUP. DOI: 10.1093/acref/9780195093544.001.0001
16. Gin, S. L. T., & Cacciafoco, F. P. (2021). Toponyms as a gateway to society: An Abui case study. Old World: Journal of Ancient Africa and Eurasia, 1(1), 1-18. DOI: 10.1163/26670755-01010008
17. Gubrium, J., & Holstein, J. (2009). Analyzing narrative reality. Sage.
18. Hassanein, H. (2023). Toward a new typology of al-ṭibāq ‘antonymy’ in Qur’anic Arabic. Al-’Arabiyya, 55-56, 143-174.
19. Hockett, C. (1963). The problem of universals in language. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language (pp. 1-22). MIT Press.
20. Hurford, J. R., Heasley, B., & Smith, M. B. (2007). Semantics: A coursebook (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
21. Juraeva, I. A. (2021). Lexical-semantic features of anthroponyms in English language. The Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(4), 19-21. DOI: 10.47750/cibg.2021.27.04.004 EDN: XRNWQB
22. Kostanski, L., & Puzey, G. (2016). Trends in onomastics: An introduction. In G. Puzey & L. Kostanski (Eds.), Names and naming: People, places, perceptions and power (pp. 13-24). Multilingual Matters.
23. Kripke, S. A. (1980). Naming and necessity. Harvard University Press.
24. Kucherenko, M. (2024). The experience of studying zoonyms in modern linguistics. Journal of Language Pedagogy and Innovative Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 40-44. DOI: 10.1997/4sn1s281
25. Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202-251). Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
26. Leech, G. (1969). A linguistic guide to English poetry. Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781315836034
27. Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., & Bracken, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 587-604. EDN: GMEIKT
28. Maklakova, E., & Magfurova, S. O. (2020). Comparative analysis of teaching zoonyms phraseological units in the function of interjection (English, French and Russian languages). Revista Conrado, 16(77), 234-238.
29. May, K. O. (1954). A set of independent necessary and sufficient conditions for simple majority decision. Econometrica, 22(1), 68-70. DOI: 10.2307/1906950
30. McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276-282. DOI: 10.11613/BM.2012.031
31. Muehleisen, V. (1997). Antonymy and semantic range in English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northwestern University.
32. MWD. (2025). Romeo. Merriam Webster Dictionary. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Romeo.
33. Ndlovu, S. (2023). Personal names and naming from an anthropological-linguistic perspective. Mouton de Gruyter.
34. Palmer, G. B. (1996). Toward a theory of cultural linguistics. University of Texas Press.
35. Polkinghorne, D. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Suny Press.
36. Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Sage.
37. Rymes, B. (2001). Names. In A. Duranti (Ed.), Key terms in language and culture (pp. 158-161). Blackwell Publishing.
38. Sharifian, F. (2011). Cultural conceptualizations and language. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: 10.1075/clscc.1
39. Sharifian, F. (2017). Cultural linguistics. Ethnolinguistic, 28, 33-61. DOI: 10.17951/et.2016.28.31
40. Sorkin, R. D., West, R., & Robinson, D. E. (1998). Group performance depends on the majority rule. Psychological Science, 9(5), 349-351. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00085 EDN: GJKWHZ
41. Ursini, F., & Long, H. (2024). Urbanonyms and their linguistic properties in Italian. Names: A Journal of Onomastics, 72(3), 65-75. DOI: 10.5195/names.2024.2682
42. Vaculík, D. (2013, May 9-11). Parts of the city of Ostrava: The past and current state of urbanonymy. In O. Felecan (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Onomastics: Onomastics in Contemporary Public Space (pp. 403-414). Baia Mare.
43. Van Langendonck, W., & Van de Velde, M. (2016). Names and grammar. In C. Hough (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of names and naming (pp. 17-38). Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199656431.001.0001
44. Völkel, S. (2023). Named entities, naming practices, and their meanings: Linguistic types and cultural contexts. International Journal of Language and Culture, 10(2), 151-175. DOI: 10.1075/ijolc.00048.vol EDN: UAJAOM
Выпуск
Другие статьи выпуска
The Elgar Encyclopaedia of Cross-Cultural Management is a series of chapters written by academic experts on the study of culture in world business management. Edited by Professor Audra Mockaitis of Maynooth University in Ireland and Professor Christina Butler of Kingston Business School in Kingston University in the UK, the articles are written by seventy-eight university teachers from all over the world examining international business cultural management issues. The book contains 77 chapters, some as short as two pages long, and examines the role of cultural understanding in international business management, each chapter containing references to sources at the end.
Hashtags are high-visibility linguistic constructs that promote cultural alignment and index ideological stances in digital environments. Although hashtags are becoming more and more popular among academics as online communication tools, little is known about how they contribute to the practical reproduction of cultural norms. Few research has looked at the language processes by which these values are passed down or reframed, despite the fact that sociological theories of cultural reproduction have long studied how customs and norms endure over generations. This study intends to fill this gap, to which end it examines how hashtags serve as practical language tools in the reproduction of cultural values in online conversation. The study uses a qualitative-pragmatic discourse analytic framework to address this question and utilises information from indexicality theory, digital discourse analysis, and language pragmatics. A multi-step interpretative approach was used to examine a deliberately and theoretically collected dataset of 90 English-language social media postings (January 2020– March 2025), which included 288 thematically significant hashtags. Indexicality, framing, pragmatic function, and presupposition were among the analytical categories. The results show that hashtags are used to index identification and ideological alignment, encode stance, and assume common cultural knowledge. Hashtags served as framing mechanisms that placed the user inside cultural narratives, and many posts featured binary oppositions (such as tradition vs. modernity). Notably, hashtags also made it easier to engage with conventional values in a critical and sarcastic way, which proved their ability to both reproduce and challenge cultural norms. According to the study’s findings, hashtags are pragmatically dense units that contribute to the perpetuation of cultural norms in online conversation. They serve as symbolic tools of continuity and emphasise the crucial function that language use in context plays in contemporary processes of social identity construction and cultural transmission.
With the rise of streaming platforms like Netflix, viewers now have greater access to language and accessibility features. Audio description (AD) translates visual information into spoken language, enabling access for viewers with visual impairments. To match the experience of sighted audiences, AD must convey all visual cues, including physical appearances. Despite its importance, this area – where accessibility and inclusivity intersect – remains understudied. This paper investigates how Netflix’s AD represents different body types, physiques, and visible disabilities among able-bodied and disabled individuals. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, the study analyses AD in two series, one film, and one documentary to assess clarity, accuracy, consistency, and implications of these descriptions. Findings reveal inconsistencies in describing body shape and size, with such references being rare and often contingent on plot relevance. Descriptions typically appear in contexts tied to body image or physical performance, especially relating to athleticism and (dis)ability. In cases involving disability, AD often describes mobility aids rather than the individuals themselves – an approach that avoids potentially offensive terms but risks reinforcing the taboo around discussing disability. The study suggests that these inconsistencies stem from both linguistic limitations and a reliance on perceived relevance. It concludes that prevailing discourse and stigma around describing human bodies complicate AD practices. Further research is needed to refine AD guidelines, ensuring they reflect the perspectives of both those being described and those who rely on AD.
This study investigates the translation of shared culture-bound expressions in the English version of the Arabic novel The Yacoubian Building and its subtitled film adaptation. A total of 50 expressions found in both the written text (RT) and the cinematic text (CT) are identified and classified into four thematic categories: swearing, idiomatic/proverbial, religious, and address expressions. The analysis examines the use of three translation strategies across these genres: cultural substitution, paraphrase, and literal translation. Cultural substitution is the most frequently used strategy overall and is consistently applied across both genres (RT 32% and CT 30%) and across thematic categories. Literal translation is more frequent in the RT (20%) than in the CT (14%), indicating a greater tolerance for cultural retention in written discourse. Paraphrase, by contrast, is employed more often in the CT (44%) than in the RT (22%), reflecting its practicality in subtitling, where spatial and temporal constraints limit the use of literal or culturally anchored renderings. The findings also reveal that swearing and religious expressions are most often translated using cultural substitution due to their cross-culturally familiar nature, while idiomatic and proverbial expressions are primarily paraphrased because of their deeply embedded linguistic and cultural features. While the translations in both genres are largely successful in conveying meaning, the study recommends expanding the use of cultural substitution in audiovisual contexts to maintain viewer engagement and preserve discursive impact.
This study investigates the sociolinguistic functions of kinship terms within the Marwari speech community of Rajasthan, addressing the gap in research concerning how language structures reflect and reinforce familial and social identity. The primary aim is to explore the cultural context in which kinship terminologies are used, focusing on how these terms encode generational, hierarchical, and gendered relationships. Employing a communication ethnographic framework, the study uses participant and non-participant observation, questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, and genealogical diagrams to collect and analyse data from five native Marwari speakers. Findings reveal that Marwari kinship terms are distinctly categorised into consanguineal (blood) and affinal (marital) relations, with both core and peripheral subcategories. The terms incorporate honorifics such as /sa/ and /ɟi/ and reflect gender differentiation through suffixes like /i/ and /ni/. The structure and use of these terms not only establish familial connections but also underscore respect, social cohesion, and the deeply embedded cultural values of the Marwari community. The implications of this study are both theoretical and practical: it contributes to the understanding of how linguistic practices mediate social relationships and identity in traditional communities, highlights the cultural significance of kinship lexicons in language maintenance, and underscores the importance of preserving linguistic diversity in the face of increasing language contact and shift.
This study was motivated by the initial observations of Jordanian people’s distinct use of live (novel) and dead (conventional) linguistic metaphors when they narrate their different sad and happy experiences in natural contexts in Jordan. While there has been sufficient research into metaphor from a cognitivediscursive perspective, there has been a lack of metaphor research that links cognitive analysis with practice. The present study aims to examine if live and dead metaphors correlate with speaker’s types of experiences and find their practical implications. In this study, participants were selected using the convenience sampling strategy. The collected metaphorical expressions from participants went through four analysis stages: transcription, manual identification of metaphorical expressions, inductive coding and interpretation. The present study uses discourse analysis to enrich the practice approach (e. g., effective (in)formal communication). This paper found that people narrating their sad experiences rely on live metaphors more than dead metaphors. This can be attributed to two reasons. Live metaphors serve as rhetorical devices that can attract the addressee’s attention and facilitate articulating sensitive issues more effectively than conventional or dead metaphors. This study thus suggests that live metaphors have a more effective role than dead metaphors in various modes of professional communication such as psychological counselling, politics and debates. This distinction, as revealed by the data analysis, can bear important implications that are worth considering in various fields. Thus, this study recommends communication and rhetoric researchers to investigate how live metaphors can strategically be employed in such modes of communication in various cultures.
This study focuses on the development of an algorithm for constructing the vocabulary of a Syrian dialectal multimedia dictionary. The significance of this research stems from the inadequate representation of Syrian dialectal lexicon in existing lexicographical resources. The novelty lies in the creation of a universal model for an Arabic dialectal multimedia dictionary, using the Syrian dialect as a foundation, and in proposing a methodology for utilising film texts as a source of Arabic dialectal vocabulary, followed by the processing of this lexical material. The initial sample of dialectal lexical items comprised 100 words and was subsequently expanded to 1,500. The proposed multimedia dictionary project caters to the needs of diverse user categories by providing, for example, etymological, phonetic, grammatical, and semantic information about each lexical unit, visualisation of its concept, and supplementary semantisation through film discourse fragments. Encompassing both original Arabic words and borrowings from languages such as Syriac, Turkish, French, and English, the dictionary aims to reflect the lexical composition of the Syrian dialect and is geared towards enhancing the systematisation and lexicography of Arabic dialects in general. This endeavour makes a substantial contribution to the fields of linguistics and lexicography, while also promoting the preservation and study of Arabic dialects.
The use of address forms varies from culture to culture according to each society’s sociocultural values and norms. Therefore, the variations in the choice, usage, and understanding of forms of address can create communication problems. This study investigates address forms used in Algerian society between nonacquaintances in different age and gender contexts. It aims to identify the main address categories used to address a stranger and to trace the impact of sociocultural norms and values on their preferences. For this purpose, a discourse-completion task (DCT) was used to collect data from 104 Algerian respondents of different ages and genders which were analysed quantitatively and qualitatively. The results show that Algerians use a variety of address forms with kinship terms dominating, followed by religious terms. They testify that politeness in Algerian society is established by showing deference and respect to elders and at the same time demonstrating intimacy and closeness to the addressee, which is prescribed by the Qur’an. However, the choice of a term is determined by age, power, gender and distance. The findings reflect the collectivist and Islamic nature of Algerian society. The paper provides new insights into the impact of cultural factors on address forms and contributes to address research, cross-cultural pragmatics, intercultural communication and second language teaching.
Издательство
- Издательство
- РУДН
- Регион
- Россия, Москва
- Почтовый адрес
- 117198, г. Москва, ул. Миклухо-Маклая, д. 6
- Юр. адрес
- 117198, г Москва, Обручевский р-н, ул Миклухо-Маклая, д 6
- ФИО
- Ястребов Олег Александрович (РЕКТОР)
- E-mail адрес
- rector@rudn.ru
- Контактный телефон
- +7 (495) 4347027
- Сайт
- https://www.rudn.ru/