1. Banovac M, Candore G, Slattery J, Houÿez F, Haerry D, Genov G, Arlett P. Patient reporting in the EU: analysis of EudraVigilance data. Drug Saf. 2017;40(7):629–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-017-0534-1
2. Valinciute-Jankauskiene A, Kubiliene L. Adverse drug reaction reporting by patients in 12 European countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(4):1507. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041507
3. Hjollund NHI. Fifteen years’ use of patient-reported outcome measures at the group and patient levels: trend analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(9):e15856. https://doi.org/10.2196/15856
4. Adopo D, Daynes P, Benkebil M, Debs A, Jonville-Berra AP, Polard E, et al. Patient involvement in pharmacovigilance: determinants and evolution of reporting from 2011 to 2020 in France. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2023;79(2):229–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-022-03422-y
5. Sinclair M, Lagan BM, Dolk H, McCullough JEM. An assessment of pregnant women’s knowledge and use of the Internet for medication safety information and purchase. J Adv Nurs. 2018;74(1):137–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13387
6. Pierce CE, Bouri K, Pamer C, Proestel S, Rodriguez HW, Van Le H, et al. Evaluation of Facebook and Twitter monitoring to detect safety signals for medical products: an analysis of recent FDA safety alerts. Drug Saf. 2017;40(4):317–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-016-0491-0
7. Freifeld CC, Brownstein JS, Menone CM, Bao W, Filice R, Kass-Hout T, Dasgupta N. Digital drug safety surveillance: monitoring pharmaceutical products in Twitter. Drug Saf. 2014;37(5):343–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-014-0155-x
8. Brajovic S, Blaser DA, Zisk M, Caligtan C, Okun S, Hall M, Pamer CA. Validating a framework for coding patient-reported health information to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities Terminology: an evaluative study. JMIR Med Inform. 2018;6(3):e42. https://doi.org/10.2196/medinform.9878
9. Dietrich J, Gattepaille LM, Grum BA, Jiri L, Lerch M, Sartori D, Wisniewski A. Adverse events in Twitter-development of a benchmark reference dataset: results from IMI WEB-RADR. Drug Saf. 2020;43(5):467–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-020-00912-9
10. Gattepaille LM, Hedfors Vidlin S, Bergvall T, Pierce CE, Ellenius J. Prospective evaluation of adverse event recognition systems in Twitter: results from the Web- RADR project. Drug Saf. 2020;43(8):797–808. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-020-00942-3
11. Caster O, Dietrich J, Kürzinger ML, Lerch M, Maskell S, Norén GN, et al. Assessment of the utility of social media for broad-ranging statistical signal detection in pharmacovigilance: results from the WEB-RADR project. Drug Saf. 2018;41(12):1355–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-018-0699-2
12. Brosch S, de Ferran AM, Newbould V, Farkas D, Lengsavath M, Tregunno P. Establishing a framework for the use of social media in pharmacovigilance in Europe. Drug Saf. 2019;42(8):921–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-019-00811-8
13. van Stekelenborg J, Ellenius J, Maskell S, Bergvall T, Caster O, Dasgupta N, et al. Recommendations for the use of social media in pharmacovigilance: lessons from IMI WEB-RADR. Drug Saf. 2019;42(12):1393–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-019-00858-7
14. Audeh B, Bellet F, Beyens MN, Lillo-Le Louët A, Bousquet C. Use of social media for pharmacovigilance activities: key findings and recommendations from the Vigi4Med project. Drug Saf. 2020;43(9):835–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-020-00951-2
15. Karapetiantz P, Bellet F, Audeh B, Lardon J, Leprovost D, Aboukhamis R, et al. Descriptions of adverse drug reactions are less informative in forums than in the French Pharmacovigilance Database but provide more unexpected reactions. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:439. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00439
16. Audeh B, Calvier FE, Bellet F, Beyens MN, Pariente A, Lillo-Le Louet A, Bousquet C. Pharmacology and social media: potentials and biases of web forums for drug mention analysis-case study of France. Health Informatics J. 2020;26(2):1253–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458219865128
17. Tutubalina E, Alimova I, Miftahutdinov Z, Sakhovskiy A, Malykh V, Nikolenko S. The Russian drug reaction corpus and neural models for drug reactions and effectiveness detection in user reviews. Bioinformatics. 2021;37(2):243–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa675
18. Zhou Z, Hultgren KE. Complementing the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System with adverse drug reaction reporting from social media: comparative analysis. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020;6(3):e19266. https://doi.org/10.2196/19266
19. Duval FV, Silva FABD. Mining in Twitter for adverse events from malaria drugs: the case of doxycycline. Cad Saude Publica. 2019;35(5):e00033417 [In English, Portuguese, Spanish]. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00033417
20. Wessel D, Pogrebnyakov N. Using social media as a source of real-world data for pharmaceutical drug development and regulatory decision making. Drug Saf. 2024;47(5):495–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-024-01409-5
21. Sadah SA, Shahbazi M, Wiley MT, Hristidis V. Demographic- based content analysis of web-based health-related social media. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(6):e148. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5327
22. Park S, Choi SH, Song YK, Kwon JW. Comparison of online patient reviews and national pharmacovigilance data for tramadol-related adverse events: comparative observational study. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022;8(1):e33311. https://doi.org/10.2196/33311
23. Micale C, Golder S, O’Connor K, Weissenbacher D, Gross R, Hennessy S, Gonzalez-Hernandez G. Patient- reported reasons for antihypertensive medication change: a quantitative study using social media. Drug Saf. 2024;47(1):81–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-023-01366-5
24. Oyebode O, Orji R. Identifying adverse drug reactions from patient reviews on social media using natural language processing. Health Informatics J. 2023;29(1):14604582221136712. https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582221136712
25. Schück S, Roustamal A, Gedik A, Voillot P, Foulquié P, Penfornis C, Job B. Assessing patient perceptions and experiences of paracetamol in France: infodemiology study using social media data mining. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(7):e25049. https://doi.org/10.2196/25049