1. Appel T., Sevcenko N., Wortha F., Tsarava K., Moeller K., Ninaus M., Kasneci E., Gerjets P. Predicting Cognitive Load in an Emergency Simulation Based on Behavioral and Physiological Measures. In: 2019 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI ‘19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2019. Pp. 154–163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3340555.3353735
2. Makransky G., Petersen G.B. The Cognitive Affective Model of Immersive Learning (CAMIL): A Theoretical Research-Based Model of Learning in Immersive Virtual Reality // Educational Psychology Review. 2021. Vol. 33. P. 937–958. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09586-2
3. Chen O., Kalyuga S. Exploring factors influencing the effectiveness of explicit instruction first and problem-solving first approaches // European Journal of Psychology of Education. 2019. Vol. 35. No. 3. P. 607–624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00445-5
4. Fang Chen, Jianlong Zhou, Yang Wang, Kun Yu, Syed Z. Arshad, Ahmad Khawaji, Dan Conway. Eye-Based Measures // Robust Multimodal Cognitive Load Measurement. Series: Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, Cham, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31700-7_4
5. Барабанщиков В.А., Жегалло А.В. Методы регистрации движений глаз: теория и практика // Психологическая наука и образование www.psyedu.ru. 2010. № 5. С. 240–254. EDN NBQWYX.
6. Sweller J. Cognitive load theory: Psychology of Learning and Motivation // Academic Press. 2011. Vol. 55. P. 37–76. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8
7. Moreno R., Mayer R.E. A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages // Journal of Educational Psychology. 2000. Vol. 92. No. 1. P. 117–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.117
8. Chen O., Castro-Alonso J.C., Paas F., Sweller J. Extending cognitive load theory to incorporate working memory resource depletion: Evidence from the spacing effect // Educational Psychology Review. 2018. Vol. 30. P. 483–501. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-017-9426-2
9. Šola H.M., Qureshi F.H., Khawaja S. AI Eye-Tracking Technology: A New Era in Managing Cognitive Loads for Online Learners. Education Sciences. 2024. Vol. 14. No. 9. Article no. 933. DOI: https://doi. org/10.3390/educsci14090933
10. Mayer R. The future of multimedia learning // Journal of Applied Instructional Design. 2022. Vol. 10. No. 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59668/423.10349
11. Petersen G.B., Petkakis G., Makransky G. A study of how immersion and interactivity drive VR learning // Computers & Education. 2022. Vol. 179. Article no. 104429. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104429
12. De Jong T. Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: Some food for thought // Instructional science. 2010. Vol. 38. No. 2. P. 105–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11251-009-9110-0
13. Hart S.G., Stavelan L.E. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research // Advances in Psychology. 1988. Vol. 52. P. 139–183. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1016/s0166-4115(08)62386-9
14. Zhou F., Yang X.J., De Winter J.C. Using eye-tracking data to predict situation awareness in real time during takeover transitions in conditionally automated driving // IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems. 2022. Vol. 23. No. 3. Pp. 2284–2295. DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2021.3069776
15. Solhjoo S., Haigney M.C., McBee E., Van Merrienboer J.J.G., Schuwirth L., Artino A.R., Battista A., Ratcliffe T.A., Lee H.D., Durning S.J. Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability Correlate with Clinical Reasoning Performance and Self-Reported Measures of Cognitive Load // Scientific Reports. 2019. Vol. 9. Article no. 14668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50280-3
16. Iqbal M.U., Srinivasan B., Srinivasa R. Fusion of EEG and Eye-Tracking Based Metrics for Characterizing the Cognitive State of Control Room Operators // Computers & Chemical Engineering. 2024. Vol. 181. Article no. 108526. DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2023.108526
17. Xie J., Wang L., Webster P., Yao Y., Sun J., Wang S., Zhou H. A two-stream end-to-end deep learning network for recognizing atypical visual attention in autism spectrum disorder // arXiv.org. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1911.11393
18. Ajayi I.H., Avksentyeva E. Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Cognitive Load in eLearning Environments using Eye Tracking Data // Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences. 2024. Vol. 22. No. 2. P. 19926–19937. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.001458
19. Li X., Xu H., Zhang J., Chang H. Deep reinforcement learning for adaptive learning systems // Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 2022. Vol. 48. No. 2. P. 220–243. DOI: https://doi. org/10.3102/10769986221129847
20. Janet B., Joshua Arul Kumar R, Mitra A., Titus S. Education data analysis using ensemble models // 2022 4th International Conference on Smart Systems and Inventive Technology (ICSSIT) Tirunelveli, India, January 20–22, 2022. Pp. 1612–1617. DOI: 10.1109/ICSSIT53264.2022.9716453
21. Zawacki-Richter O., Marín V.I., Bond M., Gouverneur F. Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education // International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2019. Vol. 16. No. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
22. Martin F., Chen Y., Moor, R.L., Westine C.D. Systematic review of adaptive learning research designs, context, strategies, and technologies from 2009 to 2018 // Educational Technology Research and Development. 2020. Vol. 68. No. 4. P. 1903–1929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09793-2