1. An R toolbox for score-based measurement invariance tests in IRT models / L. Schneider, C. Strobl, A. Zeileis, R. Debelak // Behavior Research Methods. 2021. Vol. 54. P. 2101-2113. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01689-0 EDN: BJCZJJ
2. Bauer D.J., Belzak W.C.M., Cole V.T. Simplifying the Assessment of Measurement Invariance over Multiple Background Variables: Using Regularized Moderated Nonlinear Factor Analysis to Detect Differential Item Functioning // Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 2020. Vol. 27. № 1. P. 43-55. DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2019.1642754
3. Boer D., Hanke K., He J. On Detecting Systematic Measurement Error in Cross-Cultural Research: A Review and Critical Reflection on Equivalence and Invariance Tests // Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2018. Vol. 49. № 5. P. 713-734. DOI: 10.1177/0022022117749042 EDN: VGWPRL
4. Choi Y.-J., Asilkalkan A.R. Packages for Item Response Theory Analysis: Descriptions and Features // Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives. 2019. Vol. 17. № 3. P. 168-175. DOI: 10.1080/15366367.2019.1586404
5. Evidence-Based Assessment in Special Education Research: Advancing the Use of Evidence in Assessment Tools and Empirical Processes / E. Talbott, A. De Los Reyes, D.M. Kearns, J. Mancilla-Martinez, M. Wang // Exceptional Children. 2023. Vol. 89. № 4. P. 467-487. DOI: 10.1177/00144029231171092 EDN: JUKXJW
6. Fairness in educational and psychological testing: examining theoretical, research, practice, and policy implications of the 2014 standards / Eds. J.L. Jonson, K.F. Geisinger. Washington: American Educational Research Association, 2022. 466 p. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv2kzv0fw
7. Flake J.K., Fried E.I. Measurement Schmeasurement: Questionable Measurement Practices and How to Avoid Them // Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 2020. Vol. 3. № 4. P. 456-465. DOI: 10.1177/2515245920952393 EDN: TZJBLI
8. Funder D.C., Gardiner G. MIsgivings about measurement invariance // European Journal of Personality. 2024. 7 p. Ahead of Print. DOI: 10.1177/08902070241228338 EDN: YHOCUW
9. Hajovsky D.B., Chesnut S.R. Examination of differential effects of cognitive abilities on reading and mathematics achievement across race and ethnicity: Evidence with the WJ IV // Journal of School Psychology. 2022. Vol. 93. P. 1-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2022.05.001 EDN: CBDYKM
10. Han K., Colarelli S.M., Weed N.C. Methodological and statistical advances in the consideration of cultural diversity in assessment: A critical review of group classification and measurement invariance testing // Psychological Assessment. 2019. Vol. 31(12). P. 1481-1496. DOI: 10.1037/pas0000731 EDN: ELRRUM
11. Handbook of Item Response Theory: Three Volume Set / Ed. W.J. Van Der Linden. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2018. 1500 p. DOI: 10.1201/9781315119144
12. Jöreskog K.G. Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations // Psychometrika. 1971. Vol. 36. P. 409-426. DOI: 10.1007/BF02291366 EDN: YCNNDL
13. Li H., Hunter C.V., Bialo J.A. A Revisit of Zumbo’s Third Generation DIF: How Are We Doing in Language Testing? // Language Assessment Quarterly. 2022. Vol. 19. № 1. P. 27-53. DOI: 10.1080/15434303.2021.1963253 EDN: SBYCZG
14. Luong R., Flake J.K. Measurement invariance testing using confirmatory factor analysis and alignment optimization: A tutorial for transparent analysis planning and reporting // Psychological Methods. 2023. Vol. 28(4). P. 905-924. DOI: 10.1037/met0000441 EDN: TQHSAW
15. Measurement Invariance in Relation to First Language: An Evaluation of German Reading and Spelling Tests / L. Visser, F. Cartschau, A. Von Goldammer, J. Brandenburg, M. Timmerman, M. Hasselhorn, C. Mähler // Applied Measurement in Education. 2023. Vol. 36. № 2. P. 115-131. DOI: 10.1080/08957347.2023.2201701 EDN: OUALOK
16. Measurement invariance in the social sciences: Historical development, methodological challenges, state of the art, and future perspectives / H. Leitgöb, D. Seddig, T. Asparouhov (et al.) // Social Science Research. 2023. Vol. 110. Article ID 102805. 30 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102805 EDN: GPVOVD
17. Measuring the development of general language skills in English as a foreign language-Longitudinal invariance of the C-test / B. Schnoor, J. Hartig, T. Klinger, A. Naumann, I. Usanova // Language Testing. 2023. Vol. 40. № 3. P. 796-819. DOI: 10.1177/02655322231159829 EDN: DDYRZM
18. Meredith W. Notes on factorial invariance // Psychometrika. 1964. Vol. 29. P. 177-185. DOI: 10.1007/BF02289699 EDN: IDYFNZ
19. Methodological Issues in Literacy Research Across Languages: Evidence From Alphabetic Orthographies / T.C. Papadopoulos, V. Csépe, M. Aro, M. Caravolas, I.-A. Diakidoy, T. Olive // Reading Research Quarterly. 2021. Vol. 56. № S1. P. S351-S370. DOI: 10.1002/rrq.407 EDN: QSMVJL
20. Miller L.A., Lovler R.L. Foundations of psychological testing: A practical approach. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc, 2020. 592 p.
21. Millsap R.E., Meredith W. Factorial invariance: Historical perspectives and new problems // Factor analysis at 100: Historical developments and future directions / Eds. R. Cudeck, R.C. MacCallum. New York: Routledge, 2007. P. 131-152. DOI: 10.4324/9780203936764
22. Millsap R.E. Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York: Routledge, 2011. 368 p. DOI: 10.4324/9780203821961
23. Molenaar D. A flexible moderated factor analysis approach to test for measurement invariance across a continuous variable // Psychological Methods. 2020. Vol. 26(6). P. 660-679. DOI: 10.1037/met0000360 EDN: CXAUKC
24. Non-invariance? An Overstated Problem With Misconceived Causes / C. Welzel, L. Brunkert, S. Kruse, R.F. Inglehart // Sociological Methods & Research. 2023. Vol. 52. № 3. P. 1368-1400. DOI: 10.1177/0049124121995521 EDN: ULUZMM
25. Pedraza O., van de Vijver F.J.R. Bias, equivalence, and fairness // Clinical cultural neuroscience: An integrative approach to cross-cultural neuropsychology / Ed. O. Pedraza. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. P. 252-275.
26. Putnick D.L., Bornstein M.H. Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research // Developmental Review. 2016. Vol. 41. P. 71-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004 EDN: XTXJXH
27. Robitzsch A., Lüdtke O. Why Full, Partial, or Approximate Measurement Invariance Are Not a Prerequisite for Meaningful and Valid Group Comparisons // Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 2023. Vol. 30. № 6. P. 859-870. DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2023.2191292 EDN: FNLXVL
28. Svetina D., Rutkowski L., Rutkowski D. Multiple-Group Invariance with Categorical Outcomes Using Updated Guidelines: An Illustration Using Mplus and the lavaan/semTools Packages // Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 2020. Vol. 27. № 1. P. 111-130. DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2019.1602776
29. Tay L., Meade A.W., Cao M. An Overview and Practical Guide to IRT Measurement Equivalence Analysis // Organizational Research Methods. 2015. Vol. 18. № 1. P. 3-46. DOI: 10.1177/1094428114553062
30. The Standards for educational and psychological testing [Электронный ресурс] // American Psychological Association. Washington, 2009. URL: https://www.apa.org/science/programs/testing/standards (дата обращения: 25.06.2024).
31. The dire disregard of measurement invariance testing in psychological science / E. Maassen, E.D. D’Urso, M.A.L.M. Van Assen, M.B. Nuijten, K. De Roover, J.M. Wicherts // Psychological Methods. 2023. 14 p. DOI: 10.1037/met0000624 EDN: WAOUCI
32. Van de Vijver F.J., Leung K. Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021. 250 p. DOI: 10.1017/9781107415188
33. Vandenberg R.J., Lance C.E. A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research // Organizational Research Methods. 2000. Vol. 3. № 1. P. 4-70. DOI: 10.1177/109442810031002 EDN: JOPGWD
34. Why Measurement Invariance is Important in Comparative Research. A Response to Welzel et al. (2021) / B. Meuleman, T. Żółtak, A. Pokropek, E. Davidov, B. Muthén, D.L. Oberski, J. Billiet, P. Schmidt // Sociological Methods & Research. 2023. Vol. 52. № 3. P. 1401-1419. DOI: 10.1177/00491241221091755 EDN: HDRJYH
35. Wicherts J.M. The importance of measurement invariance in neurocognitive ability testing // The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 2016. Vol. 30. № 7. P. 1006-1016. DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2016.1205136
36. Widaman K.F., Ferrer E., Conger R.D. Factorial Invariance Within Longitudinal Structural Equation Models: Measuring the Same Construct Across Time // Child Development Perspectives. 2010. Vol. 4. № 1. P. 10-18. DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00110.x
37. Widaman K.F., Reise S.P. Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Applications in the substance use domain // The science of prevention: Methodological advances from alcohol and substance abuse research / Eds. K.J. Bryant, M. Windle, S.G. West. Washington: American Psychological Association, 1997. P. 281-324. DOI: 10.1037/10222-009
38. Wingen T., Berkessel J.B., Englich B. No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology // Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2020. Vol. 11. № 4. P. 454-463. DOI: 10.1177/1948550619877412