1. Kosten J. A classification of the use of research indicators // Scientometrics. 2016. Vol. 108. P. 457-464.
2. Bornmann L., Haunschild R. Does evaluative scientometrics lose its main focus on scientific quality by the new orientation towards societal impact? // Scientometrics. 2016. Vol. 108. P. 465-472.
3. Благинин В.А., Матвеева А.И. Исследовательские фронты: стратегический императив развития российской науки // Московский экономический журнал. 2016. № 4. С. 54.
4. Yu D., Yan Z.Combining machine learning and main path analysis to identify research front: from the perspective of science-technology linkage // Scientometrics. 2022. Р. 4251-4274. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-022-04443-1
5. Lancho Barrantes B.S. Exploratory factor analysis of bibliometric indicators for the Sustainable Development Goals // Scientometrics. 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-025-05256-8
6. Саргсян Ш.А., Мирзоян А.Р., Благинин В.А. Поиск ведущих научных направлений Республики Армения на основе интеллектуального анализа наукометрических данных // Bi-технологии и корпоративные информационные системы в оптимизации бизнес-процессов цифровой экономики: мат-лы VI Международной научно-практической очно-заочной конференции. 2019. С. 85-90.
7. Bascur J.P., Verberne S., van Eck N.J. et al. Which topics are best represented by science maps? An analysis of clustering effectiveness for citation and text similarity networks. Scientometrics. 2025. Vol. 130. P. 1181-1199. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-024-05218-6
8. Fujita K., Kajikawa Y., J. Mori, Sakata I. Detecting research fronts using different types of weighted citation networks. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 2014. Vol. 32. P. 129-146.
9. Bornmann L., Marx W. HistCite analysis of papers constituting the h index research front. Journal of Informetrics. 2012. Vol. 6. Iss. 2. P. 285-288.
10. Borgoyakova K.S., Bychkova E.F., Zemskov A.I., Kondrasheva I.Y. Bibliometric analysis of scientific publications on ecology based on the “Ecology: Science and technology” reference database of Russian GPNTB. Scientific and technological libraries. 2017. No. 10. P. 54-68.
11. Suriya Prabhaa S., Bindu N., Manoj P., Satheesh Kumar K. Citation network analysis of plastic electronics: Tracing the evolution and emerging research fronts. Materials Today: Proceedings. 2020. Vol. 33. Part 2. P. 1345-1350.
12. Bascur J.P., Verberne S., van Eck N.J. et al. Which topics are best represented by science maps? An analysis of clustering effectiveness for citation and text similarity networks. Scientometrics. 2025. Vol. 130. P. 1181-1199. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-024-05218-6
13. Blaginin V.A., Goncharova M.N., Sokolova E. V. “To break out from the national level”: sciento-metric vector of the Russia journals development. Manager. 2023. Vol. 14. No. 4. С. 33-57. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.29141/2218-5003-2023-14-4-3
14. Litvinenko T.V. Scientific publications in the sphere of agricultural economy: scientometric analysis of the subject matter. Bibliosfera. 2024. No. 1. P. 93-106. DOI: 10.20913/1815-3186-2024-1-93106
15. Bastrakova M.S. Formation of the Soviet system of science organization (1917-1922). M.: Nauka. 1973. 294 p. (In Russ.).
16. Science of the great country: Soviet experience in management. Edited by E.A. Dolgova. M.: RGGU, 2023. 625 p. (In Russ.).
17. Valek N.A. The role and position of the trade science within the system of scientific activities. Issues of the natural science and technology. 2025. Vol. 46. No. 2. Р. 311-341.
18. Valek N.A.Russian water science in the basеs of scientific citation. Ekaterinburg, 2021. 80 p. (In Russ.).
19. Sargsyan S., Gzoyan E., Mirzoyan A., Blaginin V. Scientometric Implosion that Leads to Explosion: Case Study of Armenian Journals. Journal of Data and Information Science. 2020. Vol. 5. No. 3. P. 187-196. DOI: 10.2478/jdis-2020-0028
20. Perianes-Rodriguez A., Waltman L. & Van Eck N.J. Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics. 2016. Vol. 10 (4). P. 1178-1195.