1. de Haan, S. (2021), ‘Bio-psycho-social interaction: an enactive perspective’, International Review of Psychiatry, 33(5), pp. 471-477. DOI: 10.1080/09540261.2020.1830753 EDN: CYVUEM
2. Depraz, N., Varela, F.J. and Vermisch, P. (2000) ‘The Gesture of Awareness: An account of its structural dynamics’, in Velmans, M. (ed.) Investigating Phenomenological Consciousness: New methodologies and maps. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company, pp. 121-136.
3. Depraz, N. (2002) ‘Entre christianisme et bouddhisme: Pour une phénoménologie du corps-esprit’, Diogène, 2002(4), pp. 25-37. DOI: 10.3917/dio.200.0025
4. Depraz, N. (2003) ‘Pratiquer la réduction: la prière du coeur’, Laval théologique et philosophique, 59(3), pp. 503-519. DOI: 10.7202/008792ar
5. Depraz, N. (2006) Comprendre la phénomenologie: une pratique concrète. Paris: Armand Colin.
6. Depraz, N. and Varela, F. (2003) ‘Au cœur du temps: l’auto-antécédence II’, Intellectica, 2003(36-37), pp. 183-208. DOI: 10.3406/intel.2003.1685
7. Dreyfus, H.L. (1972) What Computers Can’t Do. A Critique of Artificial Reason. NYC: Harper & Row.
8. Dreyfus, H.L. (1993) ‘Heidegger’s Critique of the Husserl/Searle Account of Intentionality’, Social Research. 60(1), pp. 17-38.
9. Gallagher, S. (2009), ‘Philosophical Antecedents of Situated Cognition’, in Robbins, P. and Aydede, M. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 35-52.
10. Gallagher, S. and Jacobson, R.S. (2012) ‘Heidegger and Social Cognition’, in Kiverstein, J. and Wheeler, M. (eds.) Heidegger and Cognitive Science. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 213-245.
11. Gurwitsch, A. (1979) Human Encounters in the Social World. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.
12. Heras-Escribano, M. (2021) ‘Pragmatism, enactivism, and ecological psychology: towards a unified approach to post-cognitivism’, Synthese, 198(1), pp. 337-363. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-019-02111-1 EDN: KLCLLB
13. Moran, D. (2000) ‘Heidegger’s Critique of Husserl’s and Brentano’s Accounts of Intentionality’, Inquiry, 43(1), pp. 39-65. DOI: 10.1080/002017400321361
14. Núñez, R., Allen, M., Gao, R. et al. (2019) ‘What happened to cognitive science?’, Nature Human Behaviour, 3, pp. 782-791. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-019-0626-2
15. Ramírez-Vizcaya, S., and Froese, T. (2019), ‘The Enactive Approach to Habits: New Concepts for the Cognitive Science of Bad Habits and Addiction’, Frontiers in Psychology, 10, pp. 1-12. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00301 EDN: QNKNIJ
16. Robbins, P. and Aydede, M. (2009), ‘A Short Primer on Situated Cognition’, in Robbins, P. and Aydede, M. (eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-10.
17. Thompson, E. (1986) ‘Planetary Thinking/Planetary Building: An Essay on Martin Heidegger and Nishitani Keiji’, Philosophy East and West, 36(3), pp. 235-252.
18. Thompson, E. (2005) ‘Empathy and Human Experience’, in Proctor, J.D. (ed.) Science, Religion, and Human Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 261-286.
19. Thompson, E. (2007) Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge (MA): The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
20. Thompson, E. (2007) ‘Representationalism and the phenomenology of mental imagery’, Synthese, 2008(160), pp. 397-415. DOI: 10.1007/s11229-006-9086-0
21. Thompson, E. (2015) Waking, Dreaming, Being. Self and Consciousness in Neuroscience, Meditation, and Philosophy. NYC: Columbia University Press.
22. Thompson, E. (2020) ‘Death: The Ultimate Transformative Experience’, in Lambert, E. and Schwenkler, J. (eds.) Becoming Someone New: Essays on Transformative Experience, Choice, and Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 269-288.
23. Thompson, E. and Stapleton, M. (2009) ‘Making Sense of Sense-Making: Reflections on Enactive and Extended Mind Theories’, Topoi, 2009(28), pp. 23-30. doi: 0.1007/s11245-008-9043-2. EDN: DSCSOB
24. Varela, F.J., Coutinho, A., Duripe, B., and Vaz, N.N. (1988), ‘Cognitive Networks: Immune, Neural, and Otherwise’, in Perlson, A.S. (ed.) Theoretical Immunology, Part Two. Roca Baton, London, NYC: CRC Press, pp. 359-376.
25. Aware: A pragmatics of experiencing. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing.
26. Varela, F.J., Thompson, E. and Rosch, E. (1991) The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.
27. Varela, F.J. and Depraz, N. (2003) ‘Imagining: Embodiment, Phenomenology, and Transformation’, in Wallace, B.A. (ed.) Buddhism and Science: Breaking New Ground. NYC: Columbia University Press, pp. 195-232.
28. Varela, F.J. and Shear, J. (1999) ‘First-person Methodologies: What, Why, How?’, Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(2-3), pp. 1-14.
29. Ward, D., Silvermann, D. and Villalobos, M. (2017) ‘Introduction: The Varieties of Enactivism’, Topoi, 2017(36), pp. 365-375. DOI: 10.1007/s11245-017-9484-6 EDN: HUTYTI
30. Wheeler, M. (2012) ‘Naturalizing Dasein and Other (Alleged) Heresies’, in Kiverstein, J. and Wheeler, M. (eds.) Heidegger and Cognitive Science. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 176-212.
31. Астахов, С.С. (2020) ‘Феноменология против символического искусственного интеллекта: философия научения Хьюберта Дрейфуса’, Логос, 30(2), сс. 157-193. DOI: 10.22394/0869-5377-2020-2-157-190
32. Князева, Е.Н. (2013) ‘Энактивизм: концептуальнный поворот в эпистемологии’, Вопросы философии, 2013(10), сс. 91-104.
33. Черникова, И.В. и Логиновская, Ю.В. (2020) ‘Сознание в когнитивной науке’, Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология, 2020(53), сс. 32-41. Х/53/4. DOI: 10.17223/1998863
