1. Maitland G.C. Oil and gas production // Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science. 2000. Vol. 5, No. 5–6. P. 301–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-0294(00)00069-8
2. Kuhlman K.L., Matteo E.N. Porosity and permeability: Literature review and summary // Proceedings of the 9th Conference on the Mechanical Behavior of Salt (Saltmech IX). Hannover: Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural Resources, 2018. P. 15–27.
3. Kozhevnikov E., Riabokon E., Turbakov M. A model of reservoir permeability evolution during oil production // Energies. 2021. Vol. 14, No. 9. P. 2695. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14092695
4. Nelson P.H. Pore-throat sizes in sandstones, tight sandstones, and shales // AAPG Bulletin. 2009. Vol. 93, No. 3. P. 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1306/10240808059
5. Rootare H.M. A review of mercury porosimetry // Advanced Experimental Techniques in Powder Metallurgy / Ed. by J.S. Hirschhorn, K.H. Roll. Boston, MA: Springer, 1970. P. 225–252. (Perspectives in Powder Metallurgy. Vol. 66). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-8981-5_9
6. Segesman F.F. Well-logging method // Geophysics. 1980. Vol. 45, No. 11. P. 1667–1684. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441057
7. Ulusay R. The present and future of rock testing: highlighting the ISRM suggested methods // The ISRM Suggested Methods for Rock Characterization, Testing and Monitoring: 2007–2014 / Ed. by R. Ulusay. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2014. P. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319- 07713-0_1
8. Zhang P., Lee Y.I., Zhang J. A review of high-resolution X-ray computed tomography applied to petroleum geology and a case study // Micron. 2019. Vol. 124. P. 102702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2019.102702
9. Карабутов А.А., Черепецкая Е.Б., Кравцов А.Н., Арригони М. Методы исследования структуры и свойств горных пород на образцах (краткий обзор) // Горные науки и технологии. 2018. №. 4. С. 10–20. https://doi.org/10.17073/2500-0632-2018-4-10-20
10. Liu Q., Sun M., Sun X. et al. Pore network characterization of shale reservoirs through state-ofthe- art X-ray computed tomography: A review // Gas Science and Engineering. 2023. Vol. 113. P. 204967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgsce.2023.204967
11. Grachev N. Digital core analysis – the future of petrophysics // SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference, Moscow, Russia, 16–18 October 2012. Paper SPE-160499-MS. https://doi.org/10.2118/160499-MS
12. Duliu O.G. Computer axial tomography in geosciences: an overview // Earth-Science Reviews. 1999. Vol. 48, No. 4. P. 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-8252(99)00056-2
13. Al-Rbeawi S. A review of modern approaches of digitalization in oil and gas industry // Upstream Oil and Gas Technology. 2023. Vol. 11. P. 100098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.upstre.2023.100098
14. Химуля В.В. Исследование структурных особенностей порового пространства коллектора углеводородов на основе снимков рентгеновской компьютерной томографии // Актуальные проблемы нефти и газа. 2023. Вып. 4(43). С. 44–57. https://doi.org/10.29222/ipng.2078- 5712.2023-43.art4
15. Cayron C., De Soete A. Gaillard Y. et al. Comparison of dimensional measurements from images acquired by synchrotron tomography with VGSTUDIO MAX and ImageJ // Proceedings of the Special Interest Group Meeting on Advancing Precision in Additive Manufacturing. Bedford, UK: European Society for Precision Engineering and Nanotechnology, 2021. P. 98–101.
16. Kaur H., Kaur N., Neeru N. Evolution of multiorgan segmentation techniques from traditional to deep learning in abdominal CT images – A systematic review // Displays. 2022. Vol. 73. P. 102223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2022.102223
17. Yang E., Kang D.H., Ahn T. et al. Construction of reliable flow simulation domain and estimation of permeability based on nuclear magnetic resonance and 3D X-ray computed tomography for reservoir carbonate rocks // Transport in Porous Media. 2022. Vol. 143. P. 739–763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-022-01807-2
18. Khimulia V.V., Karev V.I. Pore-scale computational study of permeability and pore space geometry in gas condensate reservoir rocks // Proceedings of the 9th International Conferenceon Physical and Mathematical Modelling of Earth and Environmental Processes / Ed. by V. Karev. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2024. P. 243–256. (Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54589-4_26
19. Linden S., Wiegmann A., Hagen H. The LIR space partitioning system applied to the Stokes equations // Graphical Models. 2015. Vol. 82. P. 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gmod.2015.06.003