1. Ababio-Donkor A., Saleh W., Fonzone A. Understanding transport mode choice for commuting: the role of affect // Transportation Planning and Technology. 2020. Vol. 43. № 4. P. 385-403. DOI: 10.1080/03081060.2020.1747203 EDN: WBCRKI
2. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991. Vol. 50. № 2. P. 179-211. DOI: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
3. Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behaviour: Reactions and reflections // Psychology & Health. 2011. Vol. 26. № 9. P. 1113-1127. DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2011.613995
4. Alonso-Almeida M. del M. To Use or Not Use Car Sharing Mobility in the Ongoing COVID-19 Pandemic? Identifying Sharing Mobility Behaviour in Times of Crisis // International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022. Vol. 19. № 5. Article ID 3127. 14 p. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19053127
5. Amirkiaee S.Y., Evengelopoulus N. Why do people rideshare? An experimental study // Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2018. Vol. 55. P. 9-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.025
6. Amit S., Kafy A. A content-based analysis to identify the influence of COVID-19 on sharing economy activities // Spatial Information Research. 2022. Vol. 30. № 2. P. 321-333. DOI: 10.1007/s41324-022-00433-w EDN: HUPDDW
7. Baumeister R.F., Bushman B. Social Psychology and Human Nature. Boston: Cengage Learning, 2014. 832 p.
8. Becker H., Ciari F., Axhausen K.W. Comparing car-sharing schemes in Switzerland: User groups and usage patterns // Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2017. Vol. 97. P. 17-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.01.004
9. Bulteau J., Feuillet T., Dantan S. Carpooling and carsharing for commuting in the Paris region: A comprehensive exploration of the individual and contextual correlates of their uses // Travel Behaviour and Society. 2019. Vol. 16. P. 77-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.tbs.2019.04.007
10. Cafiso S., Di Graziano A., Pappalardo G. Using the Delphi method to evaluate opinions of public transport managers on bus safety // Safety science. 2013. Vol. 57. P. 254-263. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.03.001
11. Carsharing business models in Germany: characteristics, success and future prospects / K. Münzel, W. Boon, K. Frenken, T. Vaskelainen // Information Systems and e-Business Management. 2018. Vol. 16. № 2. P. 271-291. DOI: 10.1007/s10257-017-0355-x EDN: OQJPJW
12. Car-sharing services: An annotated review / F. Ferrero, G. Perboli, M. Rosano, A. Vesco // Sustainable Cities and Society. 2018. Vol. 37. P. 501-518. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2017.09.020
13. Clifton K., Carrasco J.A. Workshop Synthesis: Measuring attitudes and perceptions in quantitative surveys // Transportation Research Procedia. 2018. Vol. 32. P. 495-500. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2018.10.040
14. Curtale R., Liao F., van der Waerden P. User acceptance of electric car-sharing services: The case of the Netherlands // Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2021. Vol. 149. P. 266-282. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2021.05.006 EDN: TNQBDG
15. Different business models - different users? Uncovering the motives and characteristics of business-to-consumer and peer-to-peer carsharing adopters in The Netherlands / K. Münzel, L. Piscicelli, W. Boon, K. Frenken // Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 2019. Vol. 73. P. 276-306. DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2019.07.001
16. Effects of Parking Provision on Automobile Use in Cities: Inferring Causality / C.T. McCahill, N. Garrick, C. Atkinson-Palombo, A. Polinski // Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2016. Vol. 2543. № 1. P. 159-165. DOI: 10.3141/2543-19
17. Efthymiou D., Antoniou C. Modeling the propensity to join carsharing using hybrid choice models and mixed survey data // Transport Policy. 2016. Vol. 51. P. 143-149. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.07.001
18. Emotional Geographies / Eds. J. Davidson, L. Bondi, M. Smith. New York: Routledge, 2016. 272 p. DOI: 10.4324/9781315579245
19. Examining the impact of car-sharing on private vehicle ownership / F. Zhou, Z. Zheng, J. Whitehead, R.K. Perrons, S. Washington, L. Page // Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2020. Vol. 138. P. 322-341. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2020.06.003 EDN: MGLJEE
20. Investigating the subjective and objective factors influencing teenagers’ school travel mode choice - An integrated choice and latent variable model / M. Kamargianni, S. Dubey, A. Polydoropoulou, C. Bhat // Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2015. Vol. 78. P. 473-488. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.06.011
21. Jain T., Rose G., Johnson M. “Don’t you want the dream?”: Psycho-social determinants of car share adoption // Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 2021. Vol. 78. P. 226-245. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.02.008 EDN: ZALIOC
22. Jin F., Yao E., An K. Understanding customers’ battery electric vehicle sharing adoption based on hybrid choice model // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020. Vol. 258. Article ID 120764. 13 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120764 EDN: KBPVMB
23. Johansson M.V., Heldt T., Johansson P. The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice // Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2006. Vol. 40. № 6. P. 507-525. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2005.09.001 EDN: RQUSCV
24. Kent de Grey R.G., Werner C.M., Lohnes K.L. Strengthening proenvironmental intentions: Intrinsic interest may support use of transport alternatives to driving alone // Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2018. Vol. 116. P. 260-274. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.06.021
25. Kostorz N., Fraedrich E., Kagerbauer M. Usage and User Characteristics - Insights from MOIA, Europe’s Largest Ridepooling Service // Sustainability. 2021. Vol. 13. № 2. Article ID 958. 18 p. DOI: 10.3390/su13020958 EDN: XQXTAJ
26. Kuss P., Nicholas K.A. A dozen effective interventions to reduce car use in European cities: Lessons learned from a meta-analysis and transition management // Case Studies on Transport Policy. 2022. Vol. 10. № 3. P. 1494-1513. DOI: 10.1016/j.cstp.2022.02.001 EDN: PCIEIL
27. Mattia G., Mugion R.G., Principato L. Shared mobility as a driver for sustainable consumptions: The intention to re-use free-floating car sharing // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019. Vol. 237. Article ID 117404. 10 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.235
28. Metcalfe R., Dolan P. Behavioural economics and its implications for transport // Journal of Transport Geography. 2012. Vol. 2. P. 503-511. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.019
29. Modeling effects of driver safety attitudes on traffic violations in China using the theory of planned behavior / C. Tan, Y. Shi, L. Bai, K. Tang, K. Suzuki, H. Nakamura // IATSS Research. 2022. Vol. 46. № 1. P. 63-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.iatssr.2022.02.001 EDN: KACLRN
30. Moody J., Zhao J. Car pride and its bidirectional relations with car ownership: Case studies in New York City and Houston // Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2019. Vol. 124. P. 334-353. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2019.04.005
31. Nordfjærn T., Rundmo T. Differences in risk perception, priorities, worry and demand for risk mitigation in transport among Norwegians in 2004 and 2008 // Safety Science. 2010. Vol. 48. № 3. P. 357-364. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2009.10.001 EDN: NXFBHF
32. Parking facilities and the built environment: Impacts on travel behavior / P. Christiansen, Ø. Engebretsen, N. Fearnley, U.J. Hanssen // Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2017. Vol. 95. P. 198-206. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.10.025
33. Perceived behavioral control moderating effects in the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis / M.S. Hagger, M.W.-L. Cheung, I. Ajzen, K. Hamilton // Health Psychology. 2022. Vol. 41. № 2. P. 155-167. DOI: 10.1037/hea0001153 EDN: BKBDBN
34. Ride-Pooling-Dienste und ihre Bedeutung für den Verkehr. Nachfragemuster und Nutzungsmotive am Beispiel von “CleverShuttle” - eine Untersuchung auf Grundlage von Buchungsdaten und Kundenbefragungen in vier deutschen Städten / A. Knie, L. Ruhrort, J. Gödde, T. Pfaff. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, 2020. 22 p.
35. Shaheen S., Martin E., Totte H. Zero-emission vehicle exposure within U.S. carsharing fleets and impacts on sentiment toward electric-drive vehicles // Transport Policy. 2020. Vol. 85. P. A23-A32. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.09.008 EDN: LCOUYL
36. Sharing strategies: carsharing, shared micromobility (bikesharing and scooter sharing), transportation network companies, microtransit, and other innovative mobility modes / S. Shaheen, A. Cohen, N. Chan, A. Bansal // Transportation, Land Use, and Environmental Planning / Ed. E. Deakin. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2020. P. 237-262. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-815167-9.00013-X
37. Social norms and public transport usage: empirical study from Shanghai / D. Zhang, J.-D. Schmöcker, S. Fujii, X. Yang // Transportation. 2016. Vol. 43. № 5. P. 869-888. DOI: 10.1007/s11116-015-9625-y EDN: QBUBGO
38. “Sustainability is a nice bonus” the role of sustainability in carsharing from a consumer perspective / B. Hartl, T. Sabitzer, E. Hofmann, E. Penz // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018. Vol. 202. P. 88-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.138
39. The demand for public transport: a practical guide / R. Balcombe, R. Mackett, N. Paulley, J. Preston, J. Shires, H. Titheridge, M. Wardman, P. White. London: Transportation Research Laboratory, 2004. 246 p.
40. The demand for public transport: The effects of fares, quality of service, income and car ownership / N. Paulley, R. Balcombe, R. Mackett, H. Titheridge, J. Preston, M. Wardman, J. Shires, P. White // Transport Policy. 2006. Vol. 13. № 4. P. 295-306. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.12.004
41. Travelers’ attitudes toward carpooling in Lahore: motives and constraints / M.A. Javid, T. Mehmood, H.M. Asif, A.U. Vaince, M. Raza // Journal of Modern Transportation. 2017. Vol. 25. P. 268-278. DOI: 10.1007/s40534-017-0135-9
42. Truong L.T., Currie G. Macroscopic road safety impacts of public transport: A case study of Melbourne, Australia // Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2019. Vol. 132. Article ID 105270. 10 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105270
43. Understanding car sharing preferences and mode substitution patterns: A stated preference experiment / A.P. Carrone, V.M. Hoening, A.F. Jensen, S.E. Mabit, J. Rich // Transport Policy. 2020. Vol. 98. P.139-147. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.03.010 EDN: YLTAYO
44. Understanding public transport satisfaction in post COVID-19 pandemic / H. Dong, S. Ma, N. Jia, J. Tian // Transport Policy. 2021. Vol. 101. P. 81-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.12.004 EDN: HDUERX
45. Unique epidemiological and clinical features of the emerging 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) implicate special control measures / Y. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Chen, Q. Qin // Journal of Medical Virology. 2020. Vol. 92. № 6. P. 568-576. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.25748 EDN: NJPXUQ
46. Using thematic analysis to explore symbolism in transport choice across national cultures / D.P. Ashmore, R. Thoreau, C. Kwami, N. Christie, N.A. Tyler // Transportation. 2020. Vol. 47. № 2. P. 607-640. DOI: 10.1007/s11116-018-9902-7 EDN: IUAGAB
47. Wang L., Zhang Q., Wong P.P.W. Purchase Intention for Green Cars Among Chinese Millennials: Merging the Value-Attitude-Behavior Theory and Theory of Planned Behavior / Frontiers in Psychology. 2022. Vol. 13. Article ID 786292. 18 p. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.786292 EDN: WVRSQM
48. What influences travelers to use Uber? Exploring the factors affecting the adoption of on-demand ride services in California / F. Alemi, G. Circella, S. Handy, P. Mokhtarian // Travel Behaviour and Society. 2018. Vol. 13. P. 88-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.tbs.2018.06.002
49. Yáñez M.F., Raveau S., Ortúzar J.D. Inclusion of latent variables in Mixed Logit models: Modelling and forecasting // Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice. 2010. Vol. 44. № 9. P. 744-753. DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2010.07.007
50. Zebardast L., Radaei M. The influence of global crises on reshaping pro-environmental behavior, case study: the COVID-19 pandemic // Science of The Total Environment. 2022. Vol. 811. Article ID 151436. 10 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151436 EDN: DIDNYN